It was sad to see what happened to Milo, but he ignored histories lessons for far too long to not have to pay a price. I was happy to see his defiance of liberal groupthink, which will prompt them to go into hysterics, rioting, and become unhinged. It is good to reveal them for the haters they are. But, his own unrestrained desires were his undoing, as is nearly always the case. He was not a good leader for the Conservative movement for three reasons which I will elaborate below.
He was an impenitent homosexual. Those who do not conquer their own vices have no business leading others, and only fellow slaves wish to be led by such people. Which is a sad testament to our nation that so many people followed him. The worst slavery is that to self, and a person who is not in control of their sexual desires, is not liberated, as that fraud Freud would have us believe, but is rather trapped in their beastly inclinations. It is terribly sad, that like most homosexuals he was molested as a child, but we all have choice. Many were molested and rejected the painful humiliation they suffered as children. Milo chose to embrace the pain his dangerous desires brought him. It was obvious he didn't love himself. He had very little self respect. When he was attacked, he would sit there and smile, and not offer up the kind of retort that a conservative man would always offer up. It was a disgrace watching him. Also, his hangdog look was a perfect illustration of how he felt about himself. Churchill once said, "He is a very modest man, with a lot to be modest about". Well, Milo wasn't even modest, but his posture told a story about himself. When one can't hold one's head up, it tells the world how they think about themselves. Good posture, an erect carriage, and holding one's head up, along with eye contact are expressions of power that emanate naturally from a Godly man. Any communications expert will tell you this. I read a book on body language when I was 21, which had nothing to do with Christianity and it reflected the points I made. Also, fumbling one's hands constantly, which Milo is apt to do, indicates nervousness and weakness. His limp wristed approach is further evidence of the evil habit he insists on persisting in. Had he chosen to renounce it, he would make a capable leader, for he has that rare quality few conservatives and liberals have, bravery and courage.
His use of language. Powerful people don't use profanity. They don't need to. They have moral authority. There will be many who think profanity is some sort of free speech issue. It's not. Its simply an illustration that one does not have the discipline and/or ability to exercise one's intellect to avoid profanity. When he went on Bill Maher and was served two F bombs to his face by Larry Wilmore, and was not indignant, that is a problem. Because meekness and humility is good, but when one lets a petty tyrant like Wilmore go off to their face, you invite even further disgrace. A correct response would have never been to go on Bill Maher's show. Conservatives have no business going on a show where the host jokes about child abuse himself. While Maher is smirking about how he brought down Milo, he and George Takei have defended molesting children in the past. Here is Bill, in all his glory. What a hypocrite he is. A powerful and wise person does not use profanity because there is no need to. Power comes from controlling oneself. When one controls oneself, and submits oneself to God, one has all the peace and dignity one needs, and any person who seeks to insult said person, cannot do so, as it was truly said, "Great peace have the righteous, Thou wilt make even his enemies to be at peace with him".
His treatment of pedophilia. Milo should know, from his own experience, how horrifyingly awful the abuse of a child is. It is a horrible crime to rob a child of their innocence. I have talked with many adults, who have serious issues due to being robbed of their innocence as a child. Christ said that if a person offends a child, which is what molestation, pedophilia, porn involving children, and abortion are, then the person is worthy of having a rope tied around their neck and being drowned. He never commanded this to be literally done, but he did say that was his attitude towards it. Milo tried to pawn it off, and as many liberals do, tried to say he did not mean it. But, I never say things on such serious topics that don't emanate from my heart's attitudes, and neither did he. He was apologizing because he was caught, and faced severe pressure. A conservative leader ought to strongly denounce homosexuality, abortion, pedophilia, and contraception and leave no doubt in the listeners mind where they stand. A leader doesn't wilt when people's pricked consciences provoke furious outrageous blowback against him/her, as billions in human history have severe allergies to the truth, and are not fond of being reminded of their actions being wrong, when they have managed to silence their conscience for so long.
Milo is the latest victim of Kinsey and Freud's fraudulent sexual revolution, which chews children up in it's voracious, vicious maw, and spits them out as damaged adults.
We are seeing things today, we never saw in 1940. If we wish to have a world of freedom, of liberty, of family values, where children retain their innocence and are not robbed of their innocence, and pressured into giving it up far too early, then we would be wise to seriously ponder how are we going to criminalize porn, abortion, contraception, and homosexuality, as they did in 1940.
If we wish to be what we never were before, we ought not to rely on the lying media or liberal schools for answers, but rather we should turn to the timeless truths which have ever guided humanity, and which will remain true thousands of years from now, as they were thousands of years ago.