Truth and Hitler Pursuant - Anniversary Month of Birth and Death

My Recent Posts

Admired as a leader, respected for his courage, merit and mettle, loved for unwavering dedication to his people, adored like a father, he restored a people’s identity and pride and this man transformed a floundering, poor and plundered nation into a united, modern, powerful and prosperous utopia. With truth in each oration and impassioned promises fulfilled, this man earned the esteem of more people than any world leader, including his conquerors. After his death, over time the same man became the most misunderstood, demonized and hated man in all history.  

 

April 20, 1889, a child is born to Alois and Klara Hitler. Alois was a stern father to say the least, and Klara the most beloved woman of Adolf’s life. Through to his untimely, some say alleged death on April 30, 1945, Klara’s photo was with him wherever he went. Adolf Hitler’s birth was 128 years ago April 20. His death was 72 years ago April 30. He was 56 when he died.

 

A boy was born, some say - to fulfill a destiny that would restore the national pride, identity and sacrament of the German Volk. Many others say many things about Adolf Hitler, including but not limited to; he was the anti-Christ of Nostradamus quatrains, second to Napoleon and preceding an eventual third; he was a fanatically racist madman that wanted to liquidate non-Germanic, non-Nordic, non-Aryan peoples; he wanted to collect Jews to imprison in so called death-camps and put six million through a handful of chimneys. Modern media has gone as far to stretch and perpetuate untruths such as; he was hopelessly addicted to drugs, he was mentally ill, he wanted to euthanize anything not blond-haired, blue-eyed and perfect among other fantastical myths. Nazi-hunting cable programs are still popular. The media’s behavior regarding The Fuhrer is reminiscent of Tupac Shakur’s successful rap career two decades after his death. Paper money is to be made from the romanticized legacy of a dead man, and no one’s name is more profitable than Adolf Hitler’s.

 

Most of us share curiosities on the two world wars, which can’t be told without emphasis on Adolf Hitler no matter which perception. In fact I’d say it’s more than curiosity. For a great many of us it’s an infatuation, even an obsession. I don’t think we’d be so wet with intrigue if we had a solid grasp of the history of one man’s life, and one nation’s struggle for survival. Understanding the footsteps of this one man, the plight of his people, the principle dangers of Bolshevism spreading west and the fight against it, the Marvel Comics version of a villainous Hitler entity can be wiped from the mind’s eye. It’s never too late to learn about Adolf Hitler, the man.

 

Biographies can be found in hundreds upon hundreds of books, movies and television programs. Many are mere reproductions and copies of prior works. Few biographies tell the story of a man who loved and respected life, a man who stood for motherhood, women’s rights, animal rights and environmental protection. He is well-known for giving the first cyanide capsule to Blondie, his German Shepherd Dog, but not for the lifetime bond and loyalty the two had to each other. Ava Braun is most often depicted as a floozy and why not…no conquered villain loved a good woman who would stand by him to the bitter end. It doesn’t work that way in the movies.

 

Some alternate perspectives can be found on the man and the era, but if you want to really understand on your own terms, based on indisputable facts and the real life conditions of pre and post WWI Europe and the Soviet Union, you’ve simply got to invest the time and energy yourself in order to obtain and compile the data. Slogging through the quicksand that is Russian history, you’ll discover some shocking truths about the Bolsheviks, Lenin and Stalin. You’ll find that the lesser of two evils was certainly not Stalin, and that if there was an anti-Christ it was in fact Joseph Stalin, not Adolf Hitler. You will wrestle with sad reality that the bad guys won in WWII - the Bolsheviks won. The Russians overcame what Germany fought against – the spread of Bolshevism and absorption into the Soviet Union.

 

The word “Hitler”, although losing its impact, has been the ultimate simile to evil in our lifetime. For most of us the phrase “concentration camp” produces imagery of mindless persecution of Jews and only Jews. The fact is, Germany was not the first, not the worst and far from the last to employ the use of concentration camps, and they weren’t Jewish camps, but labor camps for political prisoners, many of which happened to be Jewish. Conditions in a Polish camp, up until the final onslaught of the Wehrmacht were much better than in a Siberian labor camp, and these gulags continued to operate for decades after. Nobody cried about the rape and torture of German women or the genocide of German prisoners of war, meanwhile Hollywood produced drama after drama of evil Nazis killing Jews indiscriminant in so called “death camps”.

 

As far as the author of this article, he does not have a swastika tattoo (or any inked skin for that matter).   He has never been in a gang or involved in violence as an adult. Isn’t that the type who writes about Hitler in a fashion other than the socially accepted caricature – some angry, insecure man in the pen with nothing better to do but hate something? The man who writes this article once hated Hitler. Conditioning in school and mainstream media taught me how to use his name as a punchline in conversation. The man who writes this article does not subscribe to violence, total war, genocide or anything of the likes. The author of this piece has wrestled with the fact that Hitler was not responsible for WWII, that it was not a racial or holy crusade against Jews for Germans or Hitler.  These matters are rising again and it's so important that the author is willing to put his neck out for you because nothing is more fulfilling than sharing that which is pure and true. Not even the blood in our veins is purer than truth.

 

Was he perfect? No. Did he design or order the genocide of Jews or anyone? No. Did he aim to subjugate the world? No. Was there brutality in WWII? Yes, from all sides. But the next time you see an image of Adolf Hitler or a Swastika, the next time you hear German-spoken lines from one of his orations please think of the words in this article. Think of the Volk, consider what it meant to be German in the early 20th century, what it means to have European heritage, what Hitler and the Nazis represented and fought against, and above all what Hitler warned us of.  Understand what National Socialism means in contrast to what Hollywood Nazism means.  These are the early cornerstones of the great puzzle that is the world wars and Adolf Hitler, and this puzzle continues to reveal new pieces.

 

Should your interests be piqued at this point and you decide to follow up by researching the man, the myth and times, I suggest listening to, reading and understanding as many of Adolf Hitler’s speeches as you can start with - his own words. Mein Kampf might largely be inaccurate depending on when/who/when/how it was published. A 1930s European print of Mein Kampf would be worth my time because it was not censored and edited for the benefit of the conquering powers. Considering these times in which we live now, one particular document stands out; The Balfour Declaration, which reads;

 

"November 2nd, 1917

 

Dear Lord Rothschild,

 

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

 

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

 

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Arthur James Balfour"

 

 

And words of Hitler's that stand out to me are often these:

 

Yes, Germany was back then a democracy, before us. And we’ve been plundered and squeezed dry.  No.. What does democracy or authoritarian state mean for those international hyenas?  They don’t care at all.  They are only interested in one thing:  Are you willing to be plundered?  Yes or no?  Are you stupid enough to keep quiet in the process?  Yes or no?  And, when a democracy is stupid enough not to stand up, then it is good!  But when an authoritarian state declares – “You do not plunder our people any longer...” neither from the inside or outside, then that is bad.  In reality, money rules in these countries.  They talk about press freedom when in fact all of these newspapers have one owner and the owner is, in any case, the sponsor.  This press then shapes public opinion.  These political parties don’t have any differences at all, like before with us.  You already know the old political parties.  They were all the same.  Then people must think that especially in these countries of freedom and wealth there should exist a very comfortable life for its people.  But the opposite is the case.  In these countries, in the so-called “democracies” the people are by no means the main focus of attentionWhat really matters is the existence of this group of “democracy makers”.  That is the existence of a few hundred of giant capitalists who own all the factories and shares and who, ultimately, lead the people.  They are not interested at all in the great mass of people.  Jews!  They are the only ones who can be addressed as international elements because they conduct their business everywhere.  It is a small, rootless, international clique that is turning the people against each other that does not want them to have peace.  They can suppress us!  They can kill us, if you like!  But we will not capitulate!” - Adolf Hitler

 

This article is inspired by, and dedicated to the entirety of truths.

Comments

Peter Corey Added Apr 10, 2017 - 7:26pm
>Admired as a leader, respected for his courage, merit and mettle, loved for unwavering dedication to his people, respected like a father, he restored a people’s identity and pride and this man transformed a floundering, poor and plundered nation into a united, modern, powerful and prosperous utopia.

Yep. Behold his Utopia:

http://tinyurl.com/k6h5fa6

http://tinyurl.com/ksaxagr

http://tinyurl.com/lkc5gfm

Good work, Adolf! You did your country proud!
 
Jeff Michka Added Apr 10, 2017 - 8:13pm
Tommy "Nazi" Purcell begs readers: As far as the author of this article, he does not have a swastika tattoo (or any inked skin for that matter).   He has never been in a gang or involved in violence as an adult. Isn’t that the type who writes about Hitler in a fashion other than the socially accepted caricature.- Well, you palm yourself off this way, but you are at very best, a latter day Nazi Symp, at best, lacking the moral courage to be a Nazi.  Your ongoing praise of all things Third Reich is beyond bizzare, but your anti semetic crap is proforma with your buddies Billy the Nazi and "They smell bad" Michael B.  You folks should be embracing Trump, but oh oh.  Ivanka and her hubby Jared, the actual president of the United States are Jewish and in charge.  What a really typical anti semite, Tommy, the Nazi, "savior of WB." .  GO DO A REWRITE OF YOUR Saggy Adolf article, urging the stupid to spend hours watching a nazi prop film so "they'll understand".
Leroy Added Apr 10, 2017 - 8:33pm
Only a fool would deny that he didn't have some good qualities.  On balance, was he good or bad?  I say bad bordering on evil, with regards to the world outside Germany and to the Jewish people.  Ultimately, he was good for Germany.  All one has to do is look how rapidly Germany recovered after WW2.  If Hitler hadn't happened, Germany might still be an oppressed state under the thumb of France.  Germany is a great nation today, no small part due to Hitler.
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 10, 2017 - 8:56pm
Thanks for the comments, everyone.  All opinions are welcome, and even respected if presented intelligently. 
 
Leroy, your opinion is fair but I'm not sure it's balanced.   You do make an excellent point that, if Hitler did not make Germany so robust it would probably cease to have any semblance of sovereignty. 
Leroy Added Apr 10, 2017 - 9:08pm
Tom, I believe in the Holocaust.  Whether it was 1 million or 6 million, it matters not to me.  I've seen too much evidence to deny it.  Whether it was mostly Jews who perished or mostly others, it matters not to me.  Hitler obviously took over many sovereign states.  His needless assault on Russia devastating.  How can it be justified?  Millions died because of Hitler.  The Russians and Germans did most of the dying.  In the end, Germany got what it deserved.  It didn't respect human life and got none in return.  One can attempt to justify why Hitler was necessary, but it doesn't matter.  He went too far.  He rightly goes down with the despots of history.  Had he not been so ambitious, he might have gone down as a great leader.
Peter Corey Added Apr 11, 2017 - 12:07am
>Ultimately, he was good for Germany.  All one has to do is look how rapidly Germany recovered after WW2.  If Hitler hadn't happened, Germany might still be an oppressed state under the thumb of France.  Germany is a great nation today, no small part due to Hitler.
 
Congratulations. Those were quite possibly some of the most ignorant statements ever posted to WriterBeat. 
 
1) WEST Germany (you know, the non-communist, non-national-socialist, pro-capitalist part) recovered quickly after WWII because it rejected the program of the national socialists and adopted a strong commitment to classical liberalism under economic leaders like Walter Eucken and Ludwig Erhard. The recovery is known as the "German Economic Miracle", much of which consisted in undoing the stranglehold on prices, wages, interest rates, capital, labor, and natural resources imposed by Hitler and his regime.
 
2) GERMANY (that is, REUNIFIED GERMANY) is a great nation today because the Soviet Union collapsed in 1989 thus demonstrating the bankruptcy of Marxist central economic planning, and weakening it enough for lots of pissed off Germans (both "West" and "East") to demolish the Berlin Wall that had separated them since 1961. East Germany —which had been ransomed by the former Soviet Union and kept in a state of penury since the end of the war—reunited with West Germany, and thus could finally benefit from the same economic and political liberty that had helped West Germany prosper quickly decades earlier. Neither Hitler nor National Socialism had anything to do with this.
 
You can download and read the following PDF book on what it was like to do business in Hitler Germany:
 
https://mises.org/system/tdf/The%20Vampire%20Economy.pdf?file=1&type=document
The Vampire Economy:
Doing Business under Fascism
by Gunter Reimann
 
["Here is a study of the actual workings of business under national socialism. Written in 1939, Reimann discusses the effects of heavy regulation, inflation, price controls, trade interference, national economic planning, and attacks on private property, and what consequences they had for human rights and economic development. This is a subject rarely discussed and for reasons that are discomforting,: as much as the left hated the social and cultural agenda of the Nazis, the economic agenda fit straight into a pattern of statism that had emerged in Europe and the United States, and in this area, the world has not be de-Nazified. This books makes for alarming reading, as one discovers the extent to which the Nazi economic agenda of totalitarian control — without finally abolishing private property — has become the norm. The author is by no means an Austrian [economist] but his study provides historical understanding and frightening look at the consequences of state economic management."]
John G Added Apr 11, 2017 - 2:30am
Holy shit. This place is seriously fucked up.
Billy Roper Added Apr 11, 2017 - 9:56am
When the Jews control the news and entertainment media, only one side of the perspective gets told. Here's an alternative view:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrKaDpn80SI
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 11, 2017 - 11:14am
Leroy,
 
I don't know what it means to "believe in the holocaust", per say.  But that's what they want, words that come out automatically as your last comments seemed to me:
 
"Hitler obviously took over many sovereign states.  His needless assault on Russia devastating.  How can it be justified?"
 
Hitler invaded Poland as a response to atrocities committed against the German minority within the Polish borders established at the Treaty of Versailles.  He invaded Russia.  The other nations were liberated by Hitler and the German military, liberated from Soviet occupation.
 
"In the end, Germany got what it deserved.  It didn't respect human life and got none in return."
 
How is this fair?  How is it not hypocritical?  I mean, the U.S. bombs whoever, whenever and however it pleases.  Does that mean that Americans don't respect human life?  If the U.S. were to be destroyed would it be what the American people deserved?
 
Regarding your other comments, they are fair points and could be debated for hours.  You think he went to far but, how does one go to far when all of the world's superpowers conspire against you, bombing innocent civilians and their cities incessantly, to ashes.?
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 11, 2017 - 11:16am
Billy,
 
Thanks for adding the link.  Dennis Wyse's work on that film is real excellence.
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 11, 2017 - 11:18am
John G,
 
LOL.  It can be.  I just wanted to turn on the light, I know it can be shocking.
Billy Roper Added Apr 11, 2017 - 2:19pm
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 11, 2017 - 2:49pm
Billy,
 
The list of 10 reasons is remarkably similar to my article and the discussion.  It touches on everything I've said before and it's all true.  This subject, these subjects will forever increase in magnitude. 
 
I feel an auspicious sense of something to come - as if the mountain of truth is grumbling, overdue for eruption.  The revelation of truths of course, will be shocking to some but shall clear the foggy misunderstandings of most.  Well, that's wishful thinking I suppose.  
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 11, 2017 - 7:10pm
Marie,
 
What is so appalling?  I'm familiar with Bonhoeffer's story.
Jeff Michka Added Apr 11, 2017 - 8:57pm
bombing innocent civilians and their cities incessantly, to ashes.?- Ah, yes, those poor white people so criminally bombed in Dresden and Hamburg, along with other German tourist cities.  Try killing enemy combatants and their supporters.  Once again, I don't see you weeping for the dead in London, Coventry, or Rotterdam, just Germans that got what they deserved, I still don't remember the anti nazi riots in Dresden or Hamburg.  Maybe you and BILLY THE NAZI can tell us about their rejection of the Nazis and Nazi ideals that should have saved them.  God bless Arthur Harris and the brave aircrews of the US 8th Air Force.  WHAT'S SO APPALLING? THIS NAzi symp article and comments from the Usual "Seig Heil" suspects.  No, American nazism is not normal.
Jeff Michka Added Apr 11, 2017 - 8:57pm
The smell of Dresdeners cooking in the evening smells like victory....
Peter Corey Added Apr 11, 2017 - 11:19pm
>Hitler invaded Poland as a response to atrocities committed against the German minority within the Polish borders
 
Nazi Germany stage-managed a classic "false flag" operation in Poland for reasons of advertising a casus belli to the world. It's known as the "Gleiwitz Incident." For a summary, see:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident
 
"On the night of 31 August 1939, a small group of German operatives dressed in Polish uniforms and led by Naujocks[2] seized the Gleiwitz station and broadcast a short anti-German message in Polish (sources vary on the content of the message).
 
 
The Germans' goal was to make the attack and the broadcast look like the work of anti-German Polish saboteurs.[2][3]

To make the attack seem more convincing, the Germans used human corpses to pass them off as Polish attackers. They murdered Franciszek Honiok, a 43-year-old unmarried German Silesian Catholic farmer known for sympathizing with the Poles. He had been arrested the previous day by the Gestapo. He was dressed to look like a saboteur, then killed by lethal injection, given gunshot wounds, and left dead at the scene so that he appeared to have been killed while attacking the station. His corpse was subsequently presented to the police and press as proof of the attack.[4]

In addition to Honiok, several prisoners from the Dachau concentration camp[2] were drugged, shot dead on the site, and their faces disfigured to make identification impossible.[3][5] The Germans referred to them by the code phrase "Konserve" ("canned goods"). For this reason, some sources incorrectly refer to the incident as "Operation Canned Goods".[6] In an oral testimony at the trials, Erwin von Lahousen stated that his division of the Abwehr was one of two that were given the task of providing Polish uniforms, equipment, and identification cards, and that he was later told by Wilhelm Canaris that people from concentration camps had been disguised in these uniforms and ordered to attack the radio stations.[7]

The Gleiwitz incident was a part of a larger operation carried out by Abwehr and SS forces.[3] There were other incidents orchestrated by Germany along the Polish-German border at the same time as the Gleiwitz attack, such as a house torching in the Polish Corridor and spurious propaganda output. The entire project was dubbed Operation Himmler and comprised a number of incidents[8] intended to give the appearance of Polish aggression against Germany.[6]

German newspapers and politicians, including Adolf Hitler, accused Polish authorities for months before the 1939 invasion of organizing or tolerating violent ethnic cleansing of ethnic Germans living in Poland.[8][9]
 
On 1 September 1939, the day following the Gleiwitz attack, Germany launched the Fall Weiss operation – the invasion of Poland – initiating World War II in Europe. Hitler cited the border incidents in a speech in the Reichstag on the same day, with three of them called very serious, as justification for Germany's invasion of Poland.[8] He had told his generals on 22 August, just a few days earlier, "I will provide a propagandistic casus belli. Its credibility doesn't matter. The victor will not be asked whether he told the truth."[3][6]"

* * *

Aside from the false-flag casus belli, Hitler's real reason for invading Poland was that it was part of an understanding between the Third Reich and the Soviet Union to divide up eastern Europe into mutual "spheres of influence". The understanding was part of the two countries' August 1939 Non-Aggression Pact brokered by the Foreign Ministers of each country: Ribbintrop for Nazi Germany and Molotov for the Soviet Union. The understanding was known as "The Secret Protocol" and was not revealed until after the war. See:

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/addsepro.asp
 
"On the occasion of the signature of the Nonaggression Pact between the German Reich and the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics the undersigned plenipotentiaries of each of the two parties discussed in strictly confidential conversations the question of the boundary of their respective spheres of influence in Eastern Europe. These conversations led to the following conclusions:
 
1. In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement in the areas belonging to the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), the northern boundary of Lithuania shall represent the boundary of the spheres of influence of Germany and the U.S.S.R. In this connection the interest of Lithuania in the Vilna area is recognized by ea
John G Added Apr 12, 2017 - 3:31am
Purcell, if you think that fascism is about 'turning lights on' you're a disturbed, evil individual.
And you can fuck right off.
Peter Corey Added Apr 12, 2017 - 4:23am
The Secret Protocol between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.
 
target="_blank">http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/addsepro.asp
 
"On the occasion of the signature of the Nonaggression Pact between the German Reich and the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics the undersigned plenipotentiaries of each of the two parties discussed in strictly confidential conversations the question of the boundary of their respective spheres of influence in Eastern Europe. These conversations led to the following conclusions:
 
1. In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement in the areas belonging to the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), the northern boundary of Lithuania shall represent the boundary of the spheres of influence of Germany and the U.S.S.R. In this connection the interest of Lithuania in the Vilna area is recognized by each party.
 
2. In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement of the areas belonging to the Polish state the spheres of influence of Germany and the U.S.S.R. shall be bounded approximately by the line of the rivers Narew, Vistula, and San.
 
The question of whether the interests of both parties make desirable the maintenance of an independent Polish state and how such a state should be bounded can only be definitely determined in the course of further political developments.
 
In any event both Governments will resolve this question by means of a friendly agreement.
 
3. With regard to Southeastern Europe attention is called by the Soviet side to its interest in Bessarabia. The German side declares; its complete political disinterestedness in these areas.
 
This protocol shall be treated by both parties as strictly secret.
 
Moscow, August 23, 1939.
 
For the Government of the German Reich:
V. RIBBENTROP
 
Plenipotentiary of the Government of the U.S.S.R.:
V. MOLOTOV"
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 12, 2017 - 10:56am
John G, very persuasive argument.
 
Peter,
 
The alleged false flag - let's say the false flag theory is accurate for the sake of argument.  First, Poles had unjustified control of German territory, declared at the Treaty of Versailles.  If the flag was false, it did not warrant the allied powers to gang up on Germany, causing the most terrible cataclysm in the history of mankind - WWII.
Jeffry Gilbert Added Apr 12, 2017 - 12:04pm
Boy do I regret letting this site use my blog today. Appalling.
 
Aww. So. Damn. Sad. Are you near your safe space dearie? Off you go now, mind the gap between train and platform. Bye. 
Billy Roper Added Apr 12, 2017 - 1:41pm
Take a look at the makeup of the defense policy makers who decided to attack Syria, and I don't just mean (((Kuchner))). However many died during the Holocaust, it obviously wasn't enough.
Jeff Michka Added Apr 12, 2017 - 2:09pm
John G notes: Purcell, if you think that fascism is about 'turning lights on' you're a disturbed, evil individual. And you can fuck right off.- join the growing movEment that feels the same, John G,  WELCOME ABOARD.  And thanks to Peter Corey for bothering to refute Nazi Tom's "article" and further attempt to "normalize" nazism.  Peter did more work to that end than I would.
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 12, 2017 - 2:10pm
The tail wags the dog in this country.  It's a mess and the U.S. military is a pawn of today's modern Pharisees in the land of Zion.  When this knot is finally untied, finally cut, real American people shall have the chance prosper once again.
Peter Corey Added Apr 12, 2017 - 9:56pm
The so-called "German territory" you're speaking of was historically part of Poland (the "Greater Polish State", or "Greater Poland"). Poland was partitioned twice, with swaths of Polish-speaking territories taken over by Prussia. Prussia (as well as its territories) was then taken over by the German Republic under Bismarck. The Treaty of Versailles returned land to Poland that had originally belonged to it.

As posted above, Hitler's public reason for invading Poland on 1 September 1939 was retribution for the atrocity at the Gleiwitz radio station, later proven to be a false flag operation for the sake of announcing a plausible "reason for war", or casus belli. The real reason for the invasion — as shown by the Secret Protocols of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Non-Aggression Pact — was to divide eastern Europe into hegemonic "spheres of influence" along with the Soviet Union, which received the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania as part of the agreement.
Steve Bergeron Added Apr 13, 2017 - 9:03am
Peter,
    Looks like you have a pretty good handle on history with regard to Hitler, Germany, et al.   Good job!
Billy Roper Added Apr 13, 2017 - 9:48am
Peter Corey is a known Zionist shill who has spent his lifetime step-and-fetching it for Jews. He's the quintessential Shabbos Goy. We now know, for instance, that Britain was planning to attack Germany before Germany went to war with Poland.
 
https://nseuropa.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/document-confirms-british-were-plotting-to-invade-germay-before-germany-invaded-poland/
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 13, 2017 - 10:35am
Peter's handle is on Wikipedia and the Jewish twist, not actual history.
Leroy Added Apr 13, 2017 - 5:37pm
"Congratulations. Those were quite possibly some of the most ignorant statements ever posted to WriterBeat."
 
The fountainhead of knowledge has spoken.  The fact is, Germany had a well-educated, technically oriented society.  It is how Germany rose out of the ashes of WWI to become a great military power.  And, yes, they did this while they were NAZIs.  Perhaps you lack the objectivity to recognise the significance.  Hitler was instrumental to the rise to power.  The German people had the necessary skills to allow them to recover a second time after WWII.  Hitler prepared them well.
Peter Corey Added Apr 13, 2017 - 11:50pm
https://forum.axishistory.com//viewtopic.php?t=183104

Testimony of [MAJOR] ALFRED HELMUT NAUJOCKS
Taken at Nuremburg, Germany, 11 September
1945, 1435-1535, by Colonel Howard A. Brundage, JAGD, OUSCC
Also present: Siegfried Ramler, Interpreter and
S/Sgt. Horace M. Levy, Court Reporter
 
Q. Tell me what he said as near as you remember.

A. Heydrich gave me the order to go with five or six people to Gleiwitz, which was clean German territory, not border. He said that practical proof for foreign press is necessary for the attack on Poland and that he counted on an outbreak of war between Germany and Poland within the next few days. It was my task to demonstrate an attack and make it on the broadcasting station in Gleiwitz and to make a speech in Polish on to the Polish minorities in Silesia. That was no clean border incident like another one to which I shall come later. This was only done for the reason of leading the press astray but I know about the different story that really constituted a border incident.


. . . Heydrich gave me the order to go to Gleiwitz, to wait for a pass-word which I was told and I had to be at the disposal any minute for the carrying out of this action and I should carry out this action only after hearing the pass-word, which would come from Heydrich directly. I had to wait quite some time; the matter was drawn out further than I expected, which was probably due to the conferences about Poland and to the meddling of the English in the Polish question. So that, at the end, I personally didn’t believe that anything would happen at all. After approximately 14 days I asked if I could return to Berlin, Then I was told by Heydrich that I had to stop and wait.
. . . The question was to make a speech in Polish through the broadcasting station in Gleiwitz in order to incite a rising of the Polish minorities who were situated in Upper Silesia.
 
. . . It should be represented this way, as if Polish minorities had attacked this broadcasting station by force. In Gleiwitz there were a number of Poles whose citizenship was Polish.

Q. In other words, you were to represent yourself as Poles.

A. Yes.

Q. Then you and your men had to attack the radio station.

A. Yes.

Q. And were supposed to seize the radio station and then make the speech.

A. Yes.

Q. Did you understand that the people working at the station knew the plan?

A. No, they knew nothing about it.
 
. . . War broke out I think on 1st September, and on the 31st August, at noon, I received the order that in the evening at exactly 8:00 o’clock, the attack on the broadcasting station would have to be carries through. That was given through to me by Heydrich personally, by way of telephone by the pass-word, naturally. Then he told me personally, “For the purpose of carrying the plan through, report to Mueller,” and he used the expression “For the canned goods,” and “Canned Goods” was Mueller’s name for the people that should remain there. [NB: "Canned Goods" = corpses from Dachau placed at the radio station]  Heydrich had a doctor, I don’t know his name exactly, and this doctor gave an injection to these people and they were then unconscious and then these people had a shot wound which was not deadly….."
 
https://forum.axishistory.com//viewtopic.php?t=183104
 
Peter Corey Added Apr 14, 2017 - 3:19am
>The fountainhead of knowledge has spoken.
 
Thanks. I humbly accept the compliment.
 
And I retract my former insult: your recent post is even stupider than your previous one, which now ranks in second place on the Stupid Scale.
 
>The fact is, Germany had a well-educated, technically oriented society. 
 
The fact is, East Germany had as many well-educated, technically oriented citizens as West Germany, yet the latter experienced an "economic miracle" after WWII while the former stagnated. If ever there was a controlled "A/B" experiment in economics, that was it. The difference between the two Germanys was not one of "educated population vs. uneducated population" but "free population vs. enslaved population." So it was capitalism, private property (including private ownership of the means of production), a court system that had been de-nazified, low taxes, low tariffs, and free movement of both capital and labor. In other words, a classical liberal political regime in the west vs. an authoritarian,  statist regime in the east.
 
Hitler had zero to do with any of this.
Peter Corey Added Apr 14, 2017 - 3:23am
And sincere thanks to Jeff Michka and Steve Bergeron for their gracious remarks.
Peter Corey Added Apr 14, 2017 - 3:31am
>It is how Germany rose out of the ashes of WWI to become a great military power. 
 
Sorry, no, that's incorrect. After WWI and the Versailles Treaty, Germany re-armed by means of loans from Switzerland while France — which could have stopped them from re-arming—looked the other way.
Billy Roper Added Apr 14, 2017 - 10:04am
Anti-White Zionist shill Peter Corey uses coerced testimony gotten through admitted physical torture to support his Philosemitism. How convincing. LOL. He's also lying about Germany's recovery, by the way.
 
Peter, are you sure that you aren't Jewish?
Billy Roper Added Apr 14, 2017 - 10:06am
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 14, 2017 - 11:38am
Peter would call red yellow if it suits him.  His links and regurgitations are far from compelling. 
Jeff Michka Added Apr 14, 2017 - 1:31pm
Aw, poor Nazi Tom and BILLY the Nazi, beset by Peter Corey, the guy they tagged as an anti-white Zionist, but that's always their point of retreat: calling opponents either Jews or Zionists or both, when, in fact, the opponents may just be anti-Nazi, like any right-minded person should be.
Leroy Added Apr 14, 2017 - 6:45pm
Peter, do you lack objectivity?  Are you so blind that you must believe everything the NAZIs did was evil?  I don't like the NAZIs, yet I can be objective enough to see the good things that it accomplished.  You are a smart guy, no doubt, but you appear to lack intelligence. Would you not say the Germans were technologically superior during WWII?  I anticipate your response: "Then why did they lose?"  My answer would be Hilter was not a great military leader and Germany was overwhelmed.  They didn't become technologically superior by being idiots.  Are you suggesting that?  Hey, look what we did for Iraq.  We gave them a shot at freedom.  It had every opportunity that Germany had.  Look what happened. The East Germans were opposed.  No doubt communism is not a viable economic system.  Only a fool would argue otherwise.    Nevertheless, the communists and socialists have generally done well at educating its populations.  Communist China made giant leaps with its economy.  It will hit a brick wall soon, but it is an example where freedom doesn't always mean progress.  Had Hitler not been so ambitious, WWII wouldn't have happened and Germany would have flourished to a point.
Peter Corey Added Apr 15, 2017 - 12:58am
>Would you not say the Germans were technologically superior during WWII?
 
Technologically superior to whom and in what way? The Reich manufactured lots of fast tanks so they were "technologically superior" to, e.g., France? And that accomplished "good things"?
 
Once more:
 
West Germany and East Germany both had lots of educated people in technical fields. Nevertheless, West Germany prospered after the war and East Germany did not. Obviously, the reason couldn't have been lack of technical expertise.
 
Mircea Negres Added Apr 15, 2017 - 3:14am
Tom, the story and history of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany as known by the general public are far from complete or unbiased. That being said, there's no denying it was a dark time which began with a bright promise, leading a nation down the road of murder, aggression and insanity along with seven decades (so far) of infamy.
 
Much as both Soviets and Nazis put effort into the Molotov-von Ribbentrop Pact, the fact is both regimes were expansionist and anyway bound to war with each other within two or three years after the treaty of non-aggression was signed, regardless of the fact that Germany attacked the USSR first. Hell, even though the Soviets denied it until the treaty was made public by Boris Yeltsin in 1992 or thereabouts, Hitler and Stalin actually had talks about dividing the world between them. That masked the fact that Hitler utterly abhorred communism and Stalin wanted to put the entire world under the hammer and sickle, but only until the truth came out decades later. Dark and ugly though that period was, the events and characters who drove them are worth studying, in order to prevent such things happening again if nothing else, but Josef and Adolf can hardly be said to be role model material no matter one guy's Iron Cross and Pour la Merite for documented bravery in WW1, because both were examples of evil walking on two legs.
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 15, 2017 - 1:40pm
Mircea,
 
Thanks for your perspective.  As always, very insightful. 
 
I'd be a fool to claim the innocence of Nazi leadership, or Hitler after the invasion of the Soviet Union.  However, it was as simple as East vs West, or would have become so eventually.  Once England and France declared war on Germany, time was of the utmost importance, and the inevitable clash between Stalin and Hitler came earlier than anyone anticipated.  Also, especially after the Dresden attacks and other terror bombing of German cities, towns and anything moving, Hitler and the Nazi leadership's chivalry waned.
 
When mentioning the Dresden attacks and terror bombings perpetrated by the Royal Air Force and the U.S. Air Force, I'm always compelled to point out that *these attacks on innocent civilians occurred one month before the London Blitz, which was a retaliatory action from Hitler and Goering.
 
Later, the V1 and V2 were responses to incessant terror attacks on German civilians, despite the sinister portrayal of these weapons.  In fact, the U.S. just used the MOAB a few days ago, which isn't too far removed from the V2 in terms of its warhead. 
Mircea Negres Added Apr 15, 2017 - 2:08pm
Tom, for whatever it's worth, here's my perspective:
"War is a war crime". The stuff that happened was horrible, no matter which side perpetrated it. I've got no problem with putting bullets in people, but regardless of what others think, I view war as wasteful and horrifying- something in which only those tough enough ought to take part, certainly not civilians, horses with their manes on fire getting shot by kindhearted Luftwaffe pilots and cows with udders desperately full of milk which were milked by passing Romanian soldiers- yeah, I heard firsthand testimony about the latter...
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 15, 2017 - 2:14pm
So many terrible stories about the Germans during the war, many of which are absolutely true.  But we here little, if anything about what happened to Germans...and that's only because they lost the war.  Thanks to defeat, all or most of the blame is caste upon the vanquished Germans and Hitler for all causes and all effects of the cataclysm.  And that's just not the truth, not according to my research.  I could be wrong, but so could the mainstream storylines. 
Mircea Negres Added Apr 15, 2017 - 2:34pm
Tom, the evil of WW2 was multi-faceted, not uni-faceted as the winners' propaganda made it out to be to those who didn't bother to take a proper gander. Yes, Hitler and the Nazis he inspired were evil, but so were the communists inspired by Lenin (Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov), Trotsky and Stalin, along with the Allied leaders who praised as heroes those who bombed into a fiery Hades the Axis civilians below...
Jeff Michka Added Apr 15, 2017 - 3:20pm
"Hystorian nazi Tom Purcell lies: I'm always compelled to point out that *these attacks on innocent civilians occurred one month before the London Blitz, which was a retaliatory action from Hitler and Goering.- The big revisionist historian, Purcell, trying to convince you the Dresden raids in February 1945, resulted in "retaliation" from Germany bombing LONDON and other British cities in 1940-41.  "THIRD Reich Retaliation via Time Machine" as ordered by Tom's heroes, Hitler and Goering.  As always, a fabrication by WB's Third Reichists and Nazis.  It's all they've got.  Ah, the smell of GERMANS roasting on an open wreckage fire...
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 15, 2017 - 4:26pm
Jeff Michka,
 
You've accurately corrected me.  I misspoke about Dresden.  That happened in '45 but the bombing of German cities did happen before the London Blitz
Jeff Michka Added Apr 16, 2017 - 11:19am
Nazi Tom says: I misspoke about Dresden.- Not misspoke, you lied to support your "poor Germans" narrative hoping the relatively unsophisticated audience you're trying to cultivate into nazi thinking on WB wouldn't know, and would applaud like circus seals at your grasp of "history,"  which now seems like Michael B's grasp of writing.  The warning here is you're just a nazi perp, not some grand historian of the cuddle side of Adolf Hitler for the masses.  WBers be warned! Nazi in the woodpile.
Tom C. Purcell Added Apr 16, 2017 - 11:30am
Jew Michka, so much bitterness and hate, and so little capacity for independent thought.  Hate blinds you as it does the Jew.
Jeff Michka Added Apr 16, 2017 - 12:30pm
Nazi Tom sez: Jew Michka, so much bitterness and hate.- Actually, just a lot of dislike, as you aren't worth "hatred."  AND if blinded, as you suggest, better it be that way than blinded by the supposed "glories" of the Third Reich, as you clearly are.
Jeff Michka Added Apr 23, 2017 - 1:46pm
Peter's handle is on Wikipedia and the Jewish twist, not actual history.- and Jew Michka, so much bitterness and hate - Nazi Tom is so accurate and right on the mark as just another run of the mill NAZI SYMPS, as are a few others on WB.