I've read that latest "debate" where Tom was accused by Expat to be a coward. I've read the whole shit on that article, the accusations, no, YOU, and no, YOU, and so forth.
What the fuck ? Which kindergarten is this now ?? I mean, we're all grown-ups, we have our different POV's, and that's it. Tom surely has a way to point out what he thinks (or he did), but he never said "Hey, that's it, believe it, or you're an asshole".
To me, there's absulutely NO taboo, be it the "holocaust" or any other genocides. As long as people forget about the other genocides in Africa caused by the West (the ancient colonies and the results), which include Ruanda, Congo, Sudan, Somalia - all influenced by the hunger for resources mainly in favor for OUR well-being - all that stuff is hypocrisy.
Or.....the genocide on Armenians by the Turks. Today a NATO member.....
And when it is a crime to mention doubts of THE holocaust happenings of the past it shows me that there is a propaganda in the game which is simply afraid that some people might question history. Was it a fake ? No. But was it as we know ? I don't know, I wasn't there.
But then I ask:
Whoever accused the French that they caused all the problems in West Africa up to now ?
Whoever accused the UK or the US of supporting Hitler before WWII ?
But everybody cries shame when it comes to THE !!!! on everyone who simply tries to give another reflection about the past and tries to shed a light on EVERYTHING that leads to such.
Why ? Because their world view could get cracks ?
I want to point out for the last time here that I'm not in favor of any genocide ;-) But I want to reserve my right to question no matter what happened or happens on that planet. If not, I might as well go back to the barn and play the sheep.