The logic of this piece of vermin and her ilk is that that no "law" could have stopped Paddock from carrying out his grisly attack, so in their logic its only reasonable to ban firearms completely, or take steps in that direction. There is a cost / benefit ratio to having guns in a free and open society. These hideous attacks are one of the costs that the media loves to trumpet on, but the benefits you never hear a fucking dicky bird on from the jewish owned mass media.
Citizens using their privately owned firearms (whether concealed carry or in their own homes) to defend themselves or their family, or prevent themselves or somebody else from being a victim of a crime. If guns were banned, what would the total death toll be of citizens who have no means to defend themselves?
The net result of privately owned firearms in the US is less dead people, less people deprived of their property by thugs, fewer raped and victimized women and fewer victims of crime. Thereis a sickness in US culture, and it has nothing to do with ownership of weapons. Mass shootings and other crime is a symptom, not a cuase. One must deal with the cuase to treat the patient and restore to full health.