It has taken me many years to adjust to labelling a group of people into their preferred acronym LGBT. I’ve inverted letters- LTBG or included others like when I inadvertently added an an “H” – LHGBT – under the thought that adding the “H” would include homosexuals.
Now I am seeing articles and arguments about the benefits or drawbacks of adding more letters. One group has recommended LGBTQIAGNC (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, asexual and gender-non-conforming).
Others propose including letters for ‘questioning’, ‘pansexual’, ‘ally’ or ‘allied’, ‘straight’, ‘leather’ and ‘fetish’ which would yield LGBTQIAGNCQPASLF. I do find this somewhat bias because since I stopped dating I now consider myself a hydro-sexual. I only have sex in the shower by myself. We need to add an H.
In addition, what about:
Trisexuals, Necrosexuals, Animal-sexuals, Group Only sexuals, Egg roll stufers, Apple Pie lovers, and Liver-box lovers. Certainly we could all handle LGBTQIAGNCQPASLFTNAGEAL to enforce the idea that heterosexuals are intolerant perverts.
Further, pedophiles are rebranding themselves as MAPS – Minor Attracted Persons or NOMAPS (Non-Offending Minor Attracted Persons), in an effort to gain acceptance and be included in the LGBT communities. Certainly these misunderstood and marginalized people deserve inclusion.
So, unless you are a hate filled Republican you should show a little compassion and refer to these marginalized groups as LGBTQIAGNCQPASLFTNAGEALMAPSNOMAPS (subject to change). If you don’t you are obviously a NAZZI, bigot, homophobe, uneducated and unable to do anything without blindly following Trump. We, the enlightened, have you conservatives figured out.