Western Civilization Ended by the American/French Revolutions

The atheist Thomas Paine who lived and worked in both the American and French Revolutions, who is a Founding Father of America, precisely enumerated what these revolutions entailed:

 

“A revolution in the state of civilization is the necessary companion of revolutions in the system of government."

 

And

 

"It is a revolution in the state of civilization that will give perfection to the Revolution of France." (Vincent editor of Paine's Agrarian Justice,  pgs. 143; 165)

 

 

The sentiment of Thomas Paine is echoed by Hess commenting on the mission of Marx: “Dr. Marx, as my idol is called, is still quite a young man (aged about 24 at most) and it is he who will give medieval religion and politics their coup de grace…” (Wikipedia, Hess {emphasis added})

 

Aristotle notes the paradigm:  “...when the form of the government has been altered and is
different it would appear to follow that the state is no longer the same state”.

 

The American and French Revolutions changed the form of government of the West; they changed it into democracy which they called "democratic republicanism" or "representative democracy" which is Modern Republicanism. Thomas Jefferson would note about their choice when he said: "the introduction of the new principle of representative democracy has rendered useless almost everything written before on the structure of government; and, in a great measure, relieves our regret, if the political writings of Aristotle or of any other ancient, have been lost, or are unfaithfully rendered
or explained to us." The FFofA purposely rejected the past; they consciously rejected the Greco-Roman heritage and patrimony!

 

The American conception of a "republic" has nothing to do with the Classical teaching! They created a new form of government. Modern Republicanism was the vehicle for destroying Western Civilization. Modern Republicanism ended Western Civilization.

 

What replaced Western Civilization was Judeo-Masonic-Bolshevism. The first part of that phrase was not coined by me but by Roman Catholics that lived in the later half of the 19th century and after the Russian Revolution, the last part was added; it is they, Roman Catholic intelligentsia, who coined the term "Judeo-Masonic-Bolshevism" for that is what they saw. That is the Civilization we live in today. America is the first Masonic Republic; that is why the symbol of America is a Star and not a Cross as in the old symbology of Europe. The Star is also symbol of the USSR, the North Vietnamese Communist Army and the North Korean Army. The Star replaced the Cross as a symbol of countries. As the symbology has changed, it also marks the change in civilization. America is the product of New ideas and New ways that came out of the Enlightenment The Enlightenment was NOT Western but the forces of  Jewish influence in the Renaissance with the Kabbala and the Gnostic introduction of the Hermetic Tradition. America and its values are NOT from Western Civilization.  The pseudo-morality of Judeo-Masonic-Bolshevism is in this current mantra charge of "Racism, Sexism, Homophobia"; that is the morality/values of Judeo-Masonic-Bolshevism. 

 

We live under the aegis of Judeo-Masonic-Bolshevism. Our values and education are derived from that. 

Comments

Ken Added Aug 6, 2018 - 8:41pm
You posted something similar just a little while ago.  Thomas Paine was not an Atheist, he was a Deist.  Why do you keep spreading that lie? 
 
The American and French revolutions were totally different.  The American revolution went to forgiveness rather than retribution because the founders believed in God and were not about retribution but Individual freedom and liberty as laid out by the Declaration of Independence..  The French Revolution was about "social justice", it was not about Faith.
 
Thomas Paine was actually locked in the Bastille for months and George Washington tried to explain to him how different the American and French revolution were and he was supporting the wrong cause, but they ended up becoming very estranged.
 
To say that the American Revolution was the end of Western Civilizaiton is folly.  The American Revolution has taken Western civilization to previously unimagined heights of freedom and innovation, prior to Marx and the introduction of fabian socialism.
 
As de Toqueville noted "America is Great, because America is Good".  As he traveled through America and noted the abounding faith and respect for each other we had.
Lindsay Wheeler Added Aug 7, 2018 - 5:40am
Thomas Paine was both. He said, "My own mind is my own church."  Writing the "Age of Reason" makes Paine an Atheist. Many people around him thought of him as an atheist. What example does he show of any type of worship?  Paine slipped between two of Deism and atheism. If one believed in God, one would accept other forms of religion but that is not the case with Paine---He hated other forms of religion with a deep passion. Paine just said he believed because he ran with the Masons and smooth relations to his reading public. His book "Age of Reason" is what Atheists write. His actions speak louder than words. His hate, his book.
 
Why do you think, Ken, that the phrase "Novus Ordo Secularum" is on the seal of the United States?  What is the Old Order? The Old Order is Western Civilization---a continuum with the Greco-Roman heritage. America was a break with it. 
 
"Individual Freedom" is not Western Civilization or Western Culture but came out of the Renaissance as the beginning stage of Globalization. Individualism is Protestant theology that morphed into political ideology. Your "Freedom" is the precursor or just another word for Anarchism. You are anarchists. Look, what is the fruit of the American Revolution of today?  The chaos and anarchy of America today!
 
The American Revolution was the inspiration for the French Revolution! Masonry played a part in both. The Enlightenment was not Western. Masonry is a gnostic religion. Gnosticism is Eastern. All of American Protestantism is Gnostic which is Eastern. 
 
Judeo-Masonic-Bolshevism is an Eastern Civilization built on the esoteric Jewish dogma of Messianism of World Unity and World Utopia and their Dignity of Man. 
 
Ken, it is fine if you want to promote American values and history, but one thing is clear, one can not claim Americanism as part of Western Civilization. Western Civilization is Dead. It is gone. 
 
This is why Chilton Williamson (2009) laments:
 
"The notion of a republic is a product of classical political thinking, which is now virtually dead in the Western world, and never appeared elsewhere. Not only has the classical political tradition become virtually extinct, the ability to think in classical terms seems to have been lost as well."
 
Well, IF THE CLASSICAL political thinking is dead-----THEN, Western Civilization is dead! It is an abuse, and it is lie that America is part of Western Civilization. A whole NEW type of thinking has emerged. That is not Western Culture. 
Ken Added Aug 7, 2018 - 7:53am
You can't be both.  Either you believe in God or you don't.  That is simply foolish.  Paine was never atheist, nothing historical shows that.  The founders were all quite faithful.  Being a deist doesn't go against "My mind is my own church".  Just like Franklin he wasn't a fan of organized religion, but he very much believed in God. 
 
As far as your quote from Williamson, an opinion quote from someone doesn't make your opinion a fact, it simply means someone else's opinion agrees with yours.  that is just silly to pass an opinion as fact
Dino Manalis Added Aug 7, 2018 - 8:08am
 Western civilization continues to exist and is growing, mimicked by Eastern Civilization.  There's a great deal of economic competition; indebtedness; and other problems, but we have to keep evolving.
Maureen Foster Added Aug 7, 2018 - 12:06pm
OK, so we live under the aegis of Judeo-Masonic-Bolshevism, what’s your point?  How does this affect the price of tea in China?
Lindsay Wheeler Added Aug 7, 2018 - 6:28pm
I can not believe this. Thomas Paine, himself said, that the American Revolution is bringing forth a new civilization. But if you don't want to take Paine, Hess, or Aristotle maybe the Atheist Machiavelli. Machiavelli is the Father of Modern Republicanism. Prof. Pocock in his book The Machiavellian Moment  sets America's government firmly in Machiavelli. Machiavelli advised:
 
"He who desires or wishes to reform the condition of a city and wishes that it be accepted and that it be able to maintain itself to everyone's satisfaction is forced to retain at least the shadow of ancient modes so that it might seem to the people that order
has not changed—though, in fact, the new orders are completely alien to those of the past. For the universality of men feed as much on appearance as on reality: indeed, in many cases, they are moved more by the things which seem than by those which are....And this much should be observed by all who wish to eliminate an ancient
way of life (un antico vivere) in a city and reduce it to a new and free way of life (ridurla a uno vivere nuovo e libero): one ought, since new things alter the minds of men, to see to it that these alterations retain as much as the ancient as possible; and if the magistrates change from those of old in number, authority, and term of office, they ought at least retain the name." Niccolo Machiavelli as quoted in Republics Ancient and Modern, Paul
A. Rahe, University of North Carolina Press. Vol II, pg 291.
 

“To eliminate an ancient way of life” was the job of modern republicanism. The above was the blueprint for the elimination of Western civilization.
 
First is the Lie that we live in Western Civilization. We don't. The symbology, the values and morals of today are NOT Western Civilization. That is why it matters. What do you think you are?  Westerners?  To attack so-called "Racism, sexism, homophobia" is not Western Culture---but Judeo-Masonic-Bolshevism. Look at the old flags of Europe---all have crosses. Now, the European Union flag like the American Flag all exhibit stars. Machiavelli says what the plan was---"Eliminate the ancient way of life". 
 
Don't kid yourself, Don't lie to yourself, Things have totally changed. There is where your values come from Ken:  "and reduce it to a new and free way of life". Do what thou wilt---Alexair Crowley. Where do your values come from?
Lindsay Wheeler Added Aug 7, 2018 - 6:31pm
Did I not post that Democracy is the vehicle for socialism and Marxism?
 
[quote] As Harvey Kaye observes, the Communist Party published a collection of Paine’s writings in 1937, and hailed him as the “foremost fighter for world democracy,” the “chief propagandist and agitator of the revolution,” and a visionary radical who saw “beyond the limits of the bourgeois revolution,” attacked the “accumulation of property,” and proposed a “system of social insurance.” [/quote] (from: Reading Paine)
 
Democracy is the carrier of Gnosticism. Gnosticism is not Western Culture nor Western Civilization. 
Maureen Foster Added Aug 7, 2018 - 8:49pm
Was any of that directed towards me?
Cullen Kehoe Added Aug 7, 2018 - 9:00pm
The Founding Fathers were nearly all Free Masons because it was a secret society where you could talk about overthrowing the government and not get in trouble. 
 
The American republic was set up as an almost copy of Great Britain, except they swapped the king for a non-hereditary (elected) president. The Queen today signs bills into law and occasionally vetoes laws. She's the head of state and the commander in chief of the military. So how can you claim that the American Revolution and Constitutional 'ended' Western Civilization? It wasn't really any different from Great Britain. 
 
The government of Britain, as it functioned in the 1700's gradually saw the growth of the cabinet of ministers who run government departments as reporting to Parliament instead of the monarch. But this wasn't fully codified into law until the Reform Act of 1832.
 
The reason I mention this is because the American constitution set up the cabinet as reporting to the executive (president). That is a critical difference between the governments of the U.S.A. and the U.K. today. But at the time of the American Revolution, it was still ambiguous who was really 'running the government' of Great Britain, the king or the Parliament. So the Americans appear to have created in the U.S. constitution they way they thought the English government worked (and probably how their colonial governments worked). 
 
Yes, the U.S.A. wrote language of the Enlightenment into the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, and even the Constitution, but what they actually set up wasn't really that novel (unless you consider ditching a monarch and an government sanction church body novel). The Bill of Rights was important and 'revolutionary' to explicitly identify individual rights but things were slowly moving that direction in England and France anyway. 
 
Free Masonry wasn't a religion, it was a secret society. I just don't think you have really supported your argument. What about the 1789 American society or government makes you feel it was Bolshevism? It was as capitalistic as you could get (especially with Hamilton practically running the federal government under the Washington Administration). 
 
The dropping of the cross on official seals was surely because the dropped the sanctioning of a religion or church body. 
 
- Any English and/or historians, feel free to correct me on the finer points, but I believe what I've written is factual.
Ken Added Aug 7, 2018 - 9:36pm
The founders didn't look to Machiavelli.  You are quoting people's opinions and pretending they are facts simply because they are published.
 
The founding fathers looked to Locke, Montesque especially, Plato, Cicero, and looked deeply at why ancient civilizations thrived and why they failed.  They were very learned and took a look at many of the great philosophers.
Lindsay Wheeler Added Aug 8, 2018 - 2:56am
Only a third to less than one-half were Masons. 
 
Ken, if the American Revolutionaries got their hands on King George---they would've killed him just like Oliver Cromwell did to King Charles I and the French Jacobins did to King Louis XIV.
 
The total rejection of Hierarchy. The rejection of a priestly caste. Are all Anti-Western. The Loyalists of America were a part of Western Civ. The driving of the loyalists out, the attacks upon Anglican Churches and their "popery" is the sign of NO continuation with Western Civ. 
 
What forms a man is his culture. In order to have a European--one must have European Culture. You are not Europeans. The Anglicans called the Puritans "demi-jews". The Puritans were the foundational ideology of America. Puritanism morphed into Yankee ideology. 
 
The phrase "nature and nature's god" in the Declaration of Independence does NOT refer to the Christian God---but to Benedict Spinoza's conception of God and Nature as one. I refer you to this book: Nature's God: The Heretical Origins of the American Republic
 
Locke was a socianist (and the word is spelled correctly: those that hated and rejected the Christian doctrine of the Trinity). Yes, the FFofA read a lot of the Classics literature but they also mixed in a lot of Eastern stuff. 
 
Just as the ancient Ionians Orientalized, the modern Europeans orientalized!
Ryan Messano Added Aug 8, 2018 - 3:14am
The Founders were not abunch of Masons, that is a popular bit of disinformation that has fooled millions of Americans who never bothered reading five biographies of the Founders to prove their assertions. 
 
Please get rid of Google!
Doug Plumb Added Aug 8, 2018 - 6:09am
@ Ken re "You posted something similar just a little while ago.  Thomas Paine was not an Atheist, he was a Deist.  "
 
Ken, start reading original works rather than these works through the filter of another. You cannot learn anything be reading opinions about Paine, Plato, or whoever. Reading anything but original works is a complete waste of time.
Doug Plumb Added Aug 8, 2018 - 6:12am
re "The American republic was set up as an almost copy of Great Britain, except they swapped the king for a non-hereditary (elected) president. The Queen today signs bills into law and occasionally vetoes laws. "
 
Not in Canada anymore. The banksters took over after Bretton Woods, the Governor General is symbolic and the Queens promise to uphold the common law (her obligation to us) no longer exists. Now, by the "Crown" they mean the banks of the City Of London, which the Queen must get permission to enter and is escorted. The Queen went broke just like everyone else in powerful positions, is now subservient to the banks else they break her.
Dr. Rupert Green Added Aug 8, 2018 - 6:27am
"The American conception of a "republic" has nothing to do with the Classical teaching! They created a new form of government. Modern Republicanism was the vehicle for destroying Western Civilization. Modern Republicanism ended Western Civilization."
 
Yes, America broke away from England, changed its religion, its language, its form of governance, and it educational principles. Its form of democracy is indeed different from Isreal and European countries where the losers can form a coalition to become the winners. In America, winners take all. Is that the altered republican principle of democracy? Thus Trump does not have to give anyone that did not support him a position. All he is required to do is ensure the Civil Rights of all our people.
 
As we speak about Western Civilization, I often wonder how it was influenced by African civilizations that were dying when there was no Europe.
 
 
Doug Plumb Added Aug 8, 2018 - 6:54am
The Natives also taught us about government.
Lindsay Wheeler Added Aug 8, 2018 - 11:22am
Ryan. I belong to Questia; I have a lifetime membership with this online library. (I highly suggest this resource.)  From the book: The Transatlantic Republican: Thomas Paine and the Age of Revolutions, is a chapter called: Thomas Paine, the Masonic Order, and the American Revolution.
 
[quote]"The only thing we know for sure is that on September 30, 
1774, on the very eve of his departure from London, Paine was 
given by Franklin letter of recommendation addressed to his son-in law, Richard Bache, himself Mason3 and wealthy businessman in Philadelphia. It was Bache who guided Paine's first steps in that city, where he was 
Lindsay Wheeler Added Aug 8, 2018 - 11:26am
I don't know what happened but the post was cut in half. 
 
[quote]  The only thing we know for sure is that on September 30, 1774, on the very eve of his departure from London, Paine was given by Franklin a letter of recommendation addressed to his son-in-law, Richard Bache, himself a Mason and a wealthy businessman in Philadelphia. It was Bache who guided Paine's first steps in that city, where he was to live until 1787, and where he met, among many other colonial Masons, John Witherspoon, Frederick Mulhenberg, Benjamin Rush, David Rittenhouse, William and Thomas Bradford—and, some time later, Henry Laurens, the Lee brothers, General Roberdeau, Robert Morris, Nathanael Greene, Joel Barlow, Thomas Jefferson (whose membership is not proven), and of course George Washington. And who were to become his friends in revolutionary France? Danton, Condorcet, Lafayette, Sieyès, Brissot, La Rochefoucauld, Duchâtelet, all Masons. And where did he stay after his release from prison in Paris? First with Nicolas de Bonneville and then with James Monroe, both of them well known as Freemasons. (pg 36) [end quote]
 
Here is a scholarly researched book by an academic. She does point out that many academics do NOT cover this topic. They obscure this fact of history. 
 
It is a fact that even though, like Paine, was not a member, Thomas Jefferson had Masonic and Rosicrucian literature in his library. One of them heavily annotated by Jefferson himself. 
Jeff Michka Added Aug 8, 2018 - 5:48pm
Don't bother Ryan with "sources", Lindsay.  Ryan holds whispering sessions with the foundering fathers.  And he'll tell you the foundering fathers all whisper about their desire for a state church.  And, Maureen, it's the illuminati that set tea prices, not Masons.
FacePalm Added Aug 8, 2018 - 6:55pm
"I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon constitutions, upon law and upon courts.  These are false hopes, believe me, these are false hopes.  Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it; no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it.  While it lies there it needs no constitution, no law, no courts to save it."
-- Judge Learned Hand(1872-1961), Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals
 
IOW, if you believe that Western Civilization is dead, it's dead - to YOU.  If you have liberty as an "idee fixe" in your heart, it is not.
 
The F&F were well-versed in every form of governance known to man at the time, and to a man, despised democracy; they'd all read Plato's Republic, and therefore were well apprised of it's many fatal flaws.
 
That's why:
Outside Independence Hall when the Constitutional Convention of 1787 ended, Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" 
With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, "A republic, if you can keep it."
-- Benjamin Franklin(1706-1790) US Founding Father 1787
Source: as recorded by Constitution signer James McHenry in a diary entry.
 
If one accepts the Article 6 statement that the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land, and further, accepts the principle of statutory construction known in Latin as "inclusio unius est exclusio alterius," or "the inclusion of one is to the EXCLUSION of all others," then it follows that since the word "democracy" does not appear anywhere in the 4 corners of the Constitution, America is certainly NOT one, as the word "republican" DOES appear in it.
 
If anyone hears anyone speaking favorably about democracy, one can be assured that one or more of the following applies:
1.  The speaker is unaware that the word democracy is not in the Constitution;
2.  The speaker is unaware of the aforementioned principle of statutory construction, or that this principle lawfully EXCLUDES democracy as a form of governance for the united States;
3.  The speaker has fallen prey to multiple years of Talking Head propaganda from MSM 'Big Lie" infotainment specialists;
4.  The speaker is unaware that the F&F despised democracy;
5.  The speaker knows full well that Lenin specifically desired for democracies to be formed as an ESSENTIAL stage toward the establishment of the socialist nightmare-state(which is why the USSR routinely funded "democratic revolutions" worldwide), and therefore is actively complicit in attempting to destroy the Constitutional Republic.
 
i have a folder i've created called "Republic v. Democracy" quotes, and can trot out multiple proof-texts, if required.  Got the Lenin citations, too.
 
 
Lindsay Wheeler Added Aug 8, 2018 - 8:27pm
Here is a French researcher who divines the heart of Freemasonry. Vicomte Léon de Poncins sketched out its role:
“Freemasonry proclaims and spreads a new system of political, social and religious ideas; these ideas constitute a different civilization radically hostile to the old
 
"Radically hostile to the old". "Freemasonry" is a vehicle, not the thing-in-itself. 
 
FacePalm.  I point you to a book by the prof. Eric Nelson and his book The Hebrew Republic
 
[quote] ""The Hebrew revival transformed European literature and criticism, medicine and science, theology and ecclesiology and philosophy and law". 146 This Hebraic revival, also, was to deeply influence politics. The idea that a republic is any government
without a king received its exclusivist meaning from a teaching found in a "compendium of classical Midrashim" 147 which taught that monarchy is a form of idolatry. English Protestant pamphleteers picked this up and passed this into the common mainstream. They were proud to be called "Talmudical commonwealthsmen" 148 In the English Civil Wars, Puritans, Levellers and the Lollards, lead by Oliver Cromwell sought to implement a Hebraic style republic in their land. Hence, the title to their revolutionary government, along with the regicide, was titled a republic contrary to the Greek/Aristotelian/Classical meaning. The American style of government is a product of this revolution in politics. [end quote]
 
The American style of government is this supposed "Hebrew Republic"; it has no connection to the Greeks and Romans! Again, when Protestantism came to the fore, it changed the understanding of the Bible from the Catholic way which was metaphorical to literal. This "Hebraic politica" changed Europe. 
 
Facepalm here is my own study on the definition of a republic; it is mixed government and how the word was transformed: The Classical Definition of a Republic
Lindsay Wheeler Added Aug 8, 2018 - 8:51pm
As to Thomas Paine, Deist or Atheist. There is something called dissimulation. It was quite prevalent during the Early Modern Age when revolutionaries would profess their love of King all-the-while writing screeds that kings must go. 
 
If I remember from my research, Paine, living in a Christian culture feigned believe in a god, but when he wrote, or when he was in private was a diehard violent atheist. 
Doug Plumb Added Aug 8, 2018 - 9:28pm
Anyone that got up to grade 8 had read Plato.
FacePalm Added Aug 9, 2018 - 6:27am
Lindsay-
Thanks for the link to your article; i must say it looks exhaustively linked and annotated.
But first, i should perhaps make clear that what we have as a government in these united States is nowhere NEAR the vision of the Constitutional Republic the F&F gave us - with the Franklin proviso. 
 
"Did I say "republic?" By God, yes, I said "republic!"  Long live the glorious republic of the United States of America.  Damn democracy. It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive."
-- Westbrook Pegler(1894-1969) American journalist, writer
Source: New York Journal American of January 25th and 26th, 1951, under the titles "Upholds Republic of U.S. Against Phony Democracy" and "Democracy in the U.S. Branded Meaningless."
 
My studies have confirmed to me that the F&F found flaws in Rome's Republic, too, which they hoped to remedy via the separation of powers and an oath of fealty to the Constitution - and this worked for pretty close to 70 years, until Lincoln and the War for State's Rights; subsequent to that, there was the reorganization of the general government from a lawful SERVANT of the People into a corporate entity "doing business as" the UNITED STATES, which subsequently declared bankruptcies - several times - and put us at the dubious mercy of international banking concerns, for several of these are now legally the "receivers in due course" of the bankruptcies.
 
i believe we have a CHANCE to return to a Constitutional Republic, especially during the Trump admin, but such a return will not last long until the ability to hold officeholders to account is made much more strong; i don't know who it was that decided that the Oath of Office is "purely ceremonial," but it certainly isn't.  IMO, if the Oath one takes in court as either litigant or witness can result in perjury charges if you're caught lying under it, so, too, should Oathbreakers be held liable for this felony.  In fact, i daresay that unless and until public servants are prosecuted at LEAST as often as are perjurers - and for the same reason - Americans stand ZERO chance of requiring officeholders to be our servants instead of our masters.
 
"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
-- Daniel Webster(1782-1852), US Senator
MEFOBILLS Added Aug 9, 2018 - 5:17pm
A lot of people here don't know the difference between Mason and Free-Mason.
 
Free Masonary was started by Weisthaupt:
 
https://freemasonry-cg.com/johan-adam-weishaupt-the-founder-of-the-bavarian-illuminati/
 
The roots of Free-Masonary can be traced to Sabatai Sevi in 1666 when he accelerated the Kol-Niedre doctrine of deception.  
 
Free-Masonary deception from the "orient"  was coined as Oriental Lodges.  This term Orient means from the middle east, not Asia in the modern vernacular.  
 
Mason's believed in an ordered universe, hence the "Deist" type of doctrine, where order could be observed in the stars and in human endeavors.
 
Free-Masonary was a parasitical insertion into Masonary and hence Masonary proved to be the perfect vehicle, especially due to its clubby and secretive nature.  
 
Ancient Kabala methods of pyramid control from the Orient entered into the West through this mechanism.   These control mechanisms include getting adherents into compromised positions, fear, death, bribery, sex, etc.  
 
So, it is fair to ask, when did Masonary in America become corrupted.  When did it become free-masonary.  There was a lot happening around the time of the French revolution, a revolution which was funded by our "oriental" friends.
Jeff Michka Added Aug 9, 2018 - 6:53pm
Why not tell us who these "oriental friends" are, MOFO.  Must be Thais, eh?  And did those "oriental friends" create Shriners?  Might explain the red hats.
MEFOBILLS Added Aug 9, 2018 - 7:11pm
Jeff,
 
Cabala comes from the middle east.  The Western equivalent is Hermeticism.  Both religions are carried by the "merchants" which is why they shill for market money.
 
Usually movements are funded, and Cabala was funded for 1000's of years by the East/West caravan trade, where our ((friends)) took rents on the exchange rate between silver and gold.
 
Their invasion of the West was due to several events, the latest of which was Vasco -de-gamas discovery of the Southern Route.  
 
This is why the Portuguese got rich so quick as they bypassed the overland middle eastern caravan routes.  Haibaru caravaneers go all the way back to Sumer, as they plied their merchant trade between entrepot cities of the middle east.  This is why they are a mixed race people, and the religion is psychopathic.  These merchants always want to "take" and stand outside the city gates and loudly proclaim it is theirs.  
 
Sabatai Sevi was a Jew who was to be the Jewish Messiah.  When it turned out he wasn't, he told the International Jewish community that it was OK to lie using Kol-Niedre.  He lied to protect his life when Ottoman Sultan kidnapped him in 1666.   Ooops there is that magic Kabala number 666 which is "holy."
 
Because of Vasco de gama our friends moved Westward to Amsterdamn (where the Portuguese unloaded spices and metal money), to then recover their lost money power.  
 
They regained it by 1694 with advent of Bank of England, and prior to that made a lot of money scamming the Amsterdam stock market.
 
But.... go ahead Jeff, keep on bleating out your ignorance and being outraged.  Your Jewish masters also funded the slave ships and Western slave trade, using their "capital" from London and Wall Street.  
 
 
 

Recent Articles by Writers Lindsay Wheeler follows.