The global warmists are making summer last too long. Today, on September 29, a week after the autumnal equinox, the temperature at my house is over 90 degrees Fahrenheit.
Now the “scientists” of the world--in this latest religion of abstractions that supposedly controls the cosmos--agree that man is responsible for “climate change,” and we must do something about it. Even the psychiatric establishment has linked arms with the “scientists” to advocate for a “call to action,” “educational initiatives,” “alliances with other organizations,” “leadership,” “evidence-based advances,” “special responsibility,” and “radical measures” to spread the word that climate change poses a threat to public health, including mental health,” according to the September 7 issue of Psychiatric News.
Well, the climate changes every day and every minute, and each square centimeter of the earth has a different climate. This could be proven by sticking a thermometer in the ground or hanging it in a tree or dunking it in an ocean. Where in this scenario is the climate not changing? This simplistic grasp of science is too easy for the “climate scientists” to comprehend.
The fundamental precepts of modern “science” require hypotheses that can be tested, according to the “scientific method.” This method requires inclusion of a “control group,” which is identical to the test group but without the experimental intervention. It also requires that the experiment must reduce variables to one, so that the test is high in selectivity and specificity. That is, the test must measure what you want to measure (selectivity) and only that variable (specificity).
The notion that the climate is changing and that man is the cause, contains two hypotheses, neither of which is testable under the scientific method. This makes it “political science,” which employs its own methods.
It is at least as valid for me to claim the global warmists are extending summer temperatures through misguided thought forms. I’m not the first or only person to claim man can and does influence the weather through thought. This was the province of the shaman in some tribal cultures, and the premise behind Native American rain dances, and of mystics and seers around the world.
The idea of “thought forms” was popularized in the book Thought Forms: A Record of Clairvoyant Investigation by Annie Besant and CW Leadbetter, of the Theosophical Society, in 1901. The book asserted that people’s thoughts, experiences, emotions, and music have an ethereal substance that can be perceived by the psychically attuned. The book contained paintings of thoughts related to devotion and devotion sacrifice, three types of anger, three types of love (undirected, directed, and grasping) and jealousy, intellect and ambition. The authors claimed that the quality of a person’s thought influences his life experience and can affect other people. The book had a strong influence on modern art and literature. Kandinsky, Yeats, TS Eliot, Malevich and Mondrain, especially, were charmed by Theosophy. Wikipedia notes that Annie Besant and CW Leadbetter played a pivotal role in shaping the globalized culture of East-West mysticism and rationalism, sound and sight.
While the book refers specifically to individual thought forms, I’ve also read and believe there are group thought forms, too, akin to what psychiatrist Carl Jung called “archetypes,” “the collective unconscious,” or universal symbols. It could be argued that the terms “most people” or “society,” or even “we” refer to a type of mass mind thought form, the generally accepted notion of what humanity as a whole is like, what it believes, or how it thinks. Perhaps television or the mass media reflect the mass mind thought form and its assumptions.
It’s never clear how those who refer to “most people” arrive at their characterizations. I know of no one who has interviewed “most people,” yet these terms slide easily off lips and are just as easily accepted. Who are these nameless, faceless, creatures so easily packaged into stereotypes such as “liberal,” “conservative,” “black” “white,” and all the labels “we” use to lump individuals together in so much featureless protoplasm?
The “scientists” only acknowledge what they can perceive with the five senses they admit to, or with sense-extenders, like microscopes or spectroscopy. They have yet to prove life exists, or that the mind exists, and they have yet to prove the universe has only three dimensions.
If the mind exists, I would dearly love to see the “climate scientists” use theirs to bring fall weather to my back yard.