Google’s Master Plan Against Conservatives

My Recent Posts

Google employees have been exposed for attempting to manipulate search results against conservatives, hoping to steer the United States towards leftism. The Daily Caller reports.


Google employees debated whether to bury conservative media outlets in the company’s search function as a response to President Donald Trump’s election in 2016, internal Google communications obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation reveal.


The Daily Caller and Breitbart were specifically singled out as outlets to potentially bury, the communications reveal. Google engineer Scott Byer falsely labeled The Daily Caller and Breitbart as “opinion blogs” and urged his coworkers to reduce their visibility in search results.


Scott Byer stated. “How many times did you see the Election now card with items from opinion blogs (Breitbart, Daily Caller) elevated next to legitimate news organizations? That’s something that can and should be fixed,” Byer wrote.


Trump’s election in 2016 shocked many Google employees, who had been counting on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton to win.


Communications obtained by The Daily Calller News Foundation show that internal Google discussions went beyond expressing remorse over Clinton’s loss to actually discussing ways Google could prevent Trump from winning again.


This is shocking to many conservatives, and will most likely prompt more calls for Google being labeled as a public utility, where it could not discriminate against political speech.



Doug Plumb Added Dec 1, 2018 - 7:12pm
The defense from lies is truth. The defense from truth is censorship, or bullets.
Ryan Messano Added Dec 1, 2018 - 10:08pm
Google and the tech companies have more control of speech than anyone has had in the history of America.  Worse, Google is ahistorical and corrupt, and promotes depravity, and suppresses speech of gravity.
Johnny Fever Added Dec 2, 2018 - 6:56am
Google’s master plan is to make money.  It was unfortunate decision when employees, unbeknownst to the executives that run the company or the Board that hires those executives, decided to exploit the company for political gain.  However, that decision doesn’t mean the entire company and its infrastructure cares about liberalism more than making money. If it did, that quite a conspiracy you just put forth.  
Troll Hunter Added Dec 2, 2018 - 10:01am
You know, you conservatives could just make your own search engines.
But you can't, because you people don't believe in math or science, and you are all very stupid people.
And, for the record, Google's "plan" is to make a bunch of money.
Also, the Daily Caller?  Really?
A. Jones Added Dec 2, 2018 - 11:10am
James Damore, a young software engineer who was fired from Google for expressing a politically incorrect, non-conformist opinion about gender bias, is here interviewed by Dave Rubin on The Rubin Report. Worth watching.
Bill H. Added Dec 2, 2018 - 11:34am
Here's what I do and recommend to all:
Don't use Chrome (or any other Google OS).
Don't use Google as a search engine (Use Startpage or DuckDuckGo )
Use a VPN (Virtual Private Network, I presently use Cyberghost)
All of this combined will not only protect you from the "left-wing commies", but will shield you from the many prying eyes all over the internet.
Doug Plumb Added Dec 2, 2018 - 12:25pm
Bill H. I want those agents to hear what I say.
Doug Plumb Added Dec 2, 2018 - 12:25pm
Damore is very interesting.
Doug Plumb Added Dec 2, 2018 - 12:27pm
re " If it did, that quite a conspiracy you just put forth."
You can read about this conspiracy in a document called "The Open Conspiracy" (Orson Wells 1939 I think) , or you can read about it in many other places, as the above title suggests or you can ostrich your way around it.
FacePalm Added Dec 2, 2018 - 5:16pm
i have that book.
i first got interested in the subject of "Why are things the way they are?" in HS, and the first book i read on the subject was Gary Allen's "None Dare Call it Conspiracy."  It was far too complex a subject for a teenager to grasp - i may not be able to make sense of the interlocking corporate entity charts it outlined THEN, and that was 50 years ago or more.
i have since found great thinkers of all ages, from the founding of this country and before, down to the present-day, who speak of these conspiracies - but now, they're becoming ever-more blatant, open, no longer concealed from view.
The battle lines have been drawn between globalists - who want a NWO/OWG comprised of unelected bankers and corporate heads exempt from both taxes and law itself, who chip everyone left after the Purges - and Nationalists, who want nations to continue in relative freedom, with real liberty secured against those who would take it by force and "reduce them under absolute despotism," as Jefferson warned in the DoI.
The globalists have mucho dinero, and use it to influence gov't agents in their favor world-wide, so you see China implementing a nationwide surveillance state with "social credit scores," now exporting that same system to Venezuela, aided by both google and apple.  The "PtB" want this same system, worldwide.
The nationalists do NOT want a "Big Brother" system of a boot stamping on the human face forever, but to continue to expand the amount of liberty each may exercise over their own affairs consistent with not trampling the equal liberty of their fellow-man to do, and speak, and write, and make, and build as they will.
Tamara Wilhite Added Dec 2, 2018 - 6:27pm
These revelations plus their demonstrated actions (suppressing conservative sites, systematically demonetizing them, concerted un-personing of people) makes them a threat to our civil rights.
I don't trust the government taking over social media; put a Democrat President in charge, and we get the Sesame Credit system plus better censorship. Instead, break up Big Tech as monopolies, and limit how their political prejudices can impact their business policies.
Marty Koval Added Dec 2, 2018 - 6:35pm
Google a few years ago changed the definition of Fascism
from “centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition” to “right wing system of government and social organization”.
Fascism definition from Merriam-Webster dictionary is - A political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.
Google's definition of Fascism shows their bias against conservatism, when they use the phrase “right wing system of government and social organization”. This is out right deception to make conservative leaning people and organizations evil.
Google intentionally makes these changes to promote liberal leaning people as the good guys, and conservative leaning people as the bad guys.
Google also knows that the vast majority of people are lazy and will not check other sources for information to make sure what Google is saying is correct. They use this laziness to promote their left leaning philosophy.
Merriam-Webster is America's most trusted online dictionary. Are you going to trust Google's left leaning definitions or Merriam-Webster?
FacePalm Added Dec 2, 2018 - 6:38pm
i'm going to trust my hardcopy of Webster's Collegiate, and no online source at all.
Jeff Michka Added Dec 2, 2018 - 6:41pm
Trusting Merriam-Webster or Google, or maybe "trusting Marty," which would be the real joke?  You are, generally, pretty laughable, Marty, but you can't be trusted.  That's like Kenny or Lindsay telling the truth.  Nice idea, but it will never happen.
Tamara Wilhite Added Dec 2, 2018 - 9:56pm
Big Tech admitted in 2016 they were systematically supporting Dems.

Apple, Twitter, Google, Instagram collude to defeat Trump
Google discriminates against conservatives at all levels. If they'll purge women in tech for being conservative, of course they'll do it to everyone else.
Female Entrepreneur Says Google’s ‘Women in Tech’ Program Ostracized Her for Being Conservative

Google blacklists conservative employees, so you know management is politically prejudiced
And it does affect their algorithm.

96 Percent of Google Search Results for 'Trump' News Are from Liberal Media Outlets

Viewpoint Discrimination with Algorithms

Media companies’ ‘impartial’ algorithms disproportionately impact conservative material.
A. Jones Added Dec 3, 2018 - 1:16am
The main reason big corporations like those in tech support the leftist agenda of the Democratic Party is that they fear competition from free-market upstarts much more than they fear potential regulation. In fact, they often favor regulation as a way of nipping potential competition in the bud by raising the cost of compliance.
At some point, the big tech companies like Google, Microsoft, Apple, et al., will demand regulation of their industry ("for the good of the American people", of course), as well as demand some form of favored treatment, such as subsidies that no one else receives, or tax breaks that no one else receives. The history of how big, incumbent, private companies interact with government shows this pattern clearly.
I don't think the solution to this is to favor even more government involvement in the private sector by more regulation or by silly antitrust litigation for the sake of breaking up the tech companies. A better solution would be to forbid government from interacting — positively or negatively — with private companies in any way. That would end the practice of private companies lobbying for favored treatment as well.
FacePalm Added Dec 3, 2018 - 2:47am
It is my understanding that the operation of a corporate entity of any type is a privilege, not a right.
i think that there are 2 great tools lawmakers can use to rein in the abuses of these leftist companies: anti-trust legislation and/or removal of their corporate charters, forcing former corporate entities to either re-organize as sole proprietorships or as partnerships, or fold.
Every corporate entity is required by law to operate "in the public interest."  Suppression and/or elimination of Constitutionally-secured Rights is NEVER "in the public interest."  Give 'em a choice and a date-certain by which to comply, or yank their damn charters.