Quit Rolling Out The Red Carpet For The Enemy

My Recent Posts

Over the 230 years that have elapsed since the Constitution was ratified in June of 1788, we have endured and overcome numerous attempts by foreign nations to defeat us militarily, and some economically.


Domestic threats have been rare. Other than the occasional traitor, we have had no serious, well organized threats internally, the Civil War being the obvious exception, until the communists. However, the Soviet Union collapsed, and the "mainstream" media declared the Cold War over and communism defeated, and thus, all the communists in the U.S.A., aka, Stalin's Useful Idiots, magically disappeared.


There is a problem with this. As more and more organizations are springing up espousing classic, radical communist ideology and tactics, we who make up the unenlightened, unwashed masses are becoming more and more aware that something is deeply and dangerously wrong in America, and that our Constitution is, indeed, under attack by well-funded, well-organized enemies domestic. We are learning that it's not just corrupt unions like the SEIU that have become openly communist, it's Academia, Hollywood (which includes most TV), a significant portion of the Democrat Party, and perhaps most dangerous of all, the "mainstream" media.


Communist strategist Antonio Gramsci (pronounced gram-shee) wrote extensively in the 1930s about how to attain communist revolution without war, in other words, by subversion. This could be achieved, he said, by taking over education, entertainment, and the news media.


Hmmmm...Gramsci has been required reading for hard-core (rather than knee-jerk) leftists ever since, and we can see that they've done a damn fine job of putting his theories into practice.


As bad as it is public "schools" and institutions of "higher education" are churning out an endless stream of brainwashed, intolerant, often violent Marx-bots, with no understanding of our nation's history or culture, and that the entertainment industry's constant underlying message is that traditional American culture, capitalism, and white people are all evil things to be vanquished by any means necessary, and that drugs, unbridled promiscuity, and gun violence are all just A-OK, we find that the media today make sure that as few as possible critical or dissenting voices are allowed to be heard.


It's true we Bitter Clingers have Internet news sites and some talk radio programs we can access to provide alternatives to the "mainstream" liars.


On the Internet, leftist sites like MSN and Yahoo dwarf the online presence of conservative sites, as the network TV news programs do with Fox News. They ignore, spin, and distort, and in the last few years, outright lie about just about everything, convincing the gullible and the intellectually lazy that conservative white people are responsible for ALL the problems in the entire world. This needs to change.


For decades, We, the People, have sat quietly and endured rule by these fascists and communists. A sort of exception to this was the Silent Majority, which rose up and elected Ronald Reagan, twice, but then settled silently once more into the background. This again began to change with the rise of the Tea Party and then the election of Donald Trump.


Outspoken and adamant about what We, the People, want for America, not fooled by the lies that gush on a daily basis from the left, Americans in the mold of the Patriots of 1776 are ready to stand fast against the Enemies Domestic.


I, and a lot of others like me, am sick to death of watching the left, especially those in elected office, relentlessly attack and undermine our country, the Constitution, Christianity, Judaism, our morals, our values, the way we live and work. It's time to get active – very active – and throw out the trash, using whatever means are available. We can start recall drives, press for impeachment of judges and corrupt congressmen and senators, and get genuine constitutional conservatives to run. We can donate time and money to all of these activities. We can also support conservative student organizations – there are lots of them, but most people have never heard of them since the "mainstream" media never covers them.


Each of us needs to think of something, no matter how small it might seem to us, that we can do or contribute. The Enemies Domestic have begun what can only be seen as a Second Civil War for control of America.


I will NEVER give up, NEVER surrender. How about you?


Ward Tipton Added Jan 26, 2019 - 7:59pm
"Domestic threats have been rare."
I would argue that domestic threats have been nonstop ... from the efforts of the American Aristocracy and the Establishment Elite to efforts to centralize all power in an omniscient and omnipotent federal system. Our independent but united States of America and the persons living therein, have been the subject of nonstop attacks by those that would be the political ruling class instead of the servants of the persons living here. 
Marty Koval Added Jan 26, 2019 - 9:44pm
I agree with your assessment that domestic threats have been nonstop in America since its beginning as a nation.
Since the advent of television, internet, and social media the threat has accelerated tremendous, because it is faster and easier to recruit people for their cause. Even major companies and their leaders, elected politicians, the regular person are much more vocal on forcing their way of  life, lack of morality and beliefs on the country.
The court system forcing the Bible, prayer and the ten commandments from the public schools, which has been a pillar of society for 200 years. Judges legislating from the bench. People advocating  and demanding political correctness, which is restriction of free speech to squelch the timid opposition. Demonizing guns in an attempt to disarm people who are or could be a hugh resistance to their cause.
Remember when President Obama made the statement, he wanted to transform the country. He was not kidding, and his transformation, was not for the betterment of the People.
Ward Tipton Added Jan 26, 2019 - 9:52pm
"Since the advent of television, internet, and social media the threat has accelerated tremendous, because it is faster and easier to recruit people for their cause."
And made it substantially easier to engage in social engineering programs. 
Marty Koval Added Jan 26, 2019 - 10:13pm
The liberal social engineers have been using this scientific method for decades to achieve their desired results to transformed their human subjects, to think and behave just like them. They become the liberal social engineers boots on the ground to transform America into an unhealthy, immoral society that would be evil in the eyes of their opponents.
Ward Tipton Added Jan 26, 2019 - 10:29pm
Social Engineering in the implementation of the police state ... in its current form anyhow, was initiated in the Philippines by many military personal ... most of whom would move into careers in politics and/or the newly formed and forming intelligence bureaus. Television and radio just made the task much easier. 
Thomas Napers Added Jan 27, 2019 - 3:38am
What evidence do you have that the SEIU is openly communist?  I just took a look at their website and found nothing.
Whatever challenges our Constitution was under in the past it remain in place today.  So I think it’s good to be vigilant, but part of what makes our country great is the ability to challenge and interpret the meaning of the Constitution.  Or do you think we should tamper down all this free speech?
As for the Mainstream Media, thanks to the internet, its nowhere near as powerful as it once was.  Besides there are plenty of Podunk websites, television stations and newspapers doing some terrible reporting as well.
Dr. Rupert Green Added Jan 27, 2019 - 4:45am
@Marty. "Communist strategist Antonio Gramsci (pronounced gram-shee) wrote extensively in the 1930s about how to attain communist revolution without war, in other words, by subversion. This could be achieved, he said, by taking over education, entertainment, and the news media."
Yes, indoctrination, girlie boys, as role models, on TV grinning like **ing Cheshire Cat, personality cult, slug-brained thespians  being advertised as spoke person for causes that are antithetical to decency and American moral values. Colored and gender confused darkies, out of their place and making millions to kick balls, being portrayed on TV in our living rooms with that interracial miscegenation bollshit defiling our Helgas, could cause WASP like me to refang, secure our noose, tar and feather, and take back our country.
How dare these denizens defile our homes with ambush advertisings that show three men in bed touching bases as we watch TV with our young children?
"I, and a lot of others like me, am sick to death of watching the left, especially those in elected office, relentlessly attack and undermine our country, the Constitution, Christianity, Judaism, our morals, our values, the way we live and work. It's time to get active – very active – and throw out the trash, using whatever means are available" (Marty).
It would be easy to call the ones having such thoughts as racists, homophobes, and such. But by expanding and reflecting what I believe Marty wants to say, I affirm his: "I, and a lot of others like me" includes Blacks and other non-White groups are seeing what he is seeing and are seething. 
"The Enemies Domestic have begun what can only be seen as a Second Civil War for control of America.
I will NEVER give up, NEVER surrender. How about you?" (Marty)
True to preceding, but as you revealed, the battle was waged silently with devastating results at the polls. We threw out Satan for eight years then we accepted his twin brother from a different father for another eight years. Changing one oppressor/Satan for another does not seems to work.
Perhaps a bon fire of the TV would be an exercise to send a message that we patriots will act to make America great again.
But we must make sure our motive is not based on jealousy of seeing those high paying thespian or sport jocks darkies on TV, while good old American folks are living in trailer parks. It must not be seen as building a wall to keep the Black and Brown Mexicans out and tearing down one to get the Scandinavian phenotypes in.
Dino Manalis Added Jan 27, 2019 - 8:38am
 We should learn history and the failure of socialism and communism, Russia and China seem to have learned their lessons, just look  at what's happening in Venezuela and avoid it!
Marty Koval Added Jan 27, 2019 - 12:09pm
Dino Manalis
You are correct that we should learn from history. Apparently today, U.S. students are unfamiliar with the famous paraphrased aphorism, “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
 Results from the 2010 gold standard of testing, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, only 13 percent of the nation’s high school seniors showed proficiency in their knowledge of American history, and only 18 percent of eighth grades and 22 percent of fourth graders scoring as well.
The notion that American history, a once a valued subject, is no longer a priority in public schools is profoundly disconcerting. The denigration of history, in my view, will have dire ramifications as children grow up ignorant and unaware of the essential beliefs which have guided our nation for nearly three centuries.
An undereducated and disengaged public, however, is only the beginning. A firm understanding of history is paramount to the success and effectiveness of our political leaders. It is estimated there are over 60 members of the US congress that are considered socialist.
Many of the people under the age 35 believe that socialism is good for society and the country. They are just plain wrong with this assumption because of their ignorance.
Bill H. Added Jan 27, 2019 - 12:16pm
Marty - You should be concerned about Trump and his group's connections with Putin and the rest of the Russian gang. I am totally confused that the party who was once outspoken about the "Red Menace" is now content cuddling with them only because Trump approves of it.
You and others who go along with this are falling right in with the Russian long-term plan of taking over our country from within. The Russians are the world's experts at social engineering and they have been highly successful at their initial main goal of dividing the country, as we certainly see here on WB at all times.
Jeff Jackson Added Jan 27, 2019 - 12:28pm
Marty, one of our founders said it best: "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."
Ryan Messano Added Jan 27, 2019 - 6:19pm
I'll never surrender either, Marty.  Great article. 
Marty Koval Added Jan 27, 2019 - 6:53pm
Jeff Jackson:
Stewardship is defined as "the responsible overseeing and protection of something considered worth caring for and preserving"! Liberty is: "freedom from arbitrary or despotic government or control; freedom from external or foreign rule; and freedom from control, interference, obligation, restriction, hampering conditions, etc., power or right of doing, thinking, speaking, etc., according to choice." The Declaration of Independence documents our God-given right to Liberty. Therefore, it is apparent that We The People must provide the "responsible overseeing and protection." Government in and of itself cannot provide the stewardship to achieve and maintain liberty. The People must stand fast in the rule of law and turn from our foolish practices of experimenting with the careless whims of men.
One might argue that since the people established our Republic, we delegated control of our liberty to the government with the US Constitution. Liberty, however, comes from God and is the opposite of control. Since government is a process of ruling and controlling, liberty can never be delegated to an entity that is, by its very nature, an enemy of liberty.
When the People established the federal government, it was clearly intended to be limited in nature. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution spells out the specific enumerated powers of government. Amendment X of the Bill of Rights also limits government and protects liberty. "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution…. are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Liberty is fragile! The statement that "Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty" has been attributed to Thomas Jefferson and others, but the statement's truth is unquestioned. Samuel Adams said, "If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." Many would argue if liberty should cease to exist, then America itself would crumble. I believe that is what we are facing today as a nation?
Jeff Michka Added Jan 27, 2019 - 7:44pm
Ah, great...now we can all rest safe, assured Marty and Lyin Ryan will never surrender...but gee, from ace Xtain running dog to rolling out the carpet for a new HUAC.  Ryan claims he keeps an official enemies list I'm sure he'll kick in being the good free dumb loving patriot he isn't.  Yeah, the only thing "a pack of complete and hopelesss" liberals want to do is destroy America.  Why they'll all become Trump voters in the next election.  You rightist clown car drivers actually believe this shit.  What a complete pack of total morons.  Of course with a new House Unamerican Activities committee, liberals can have "subpeona envy:" "My subpeona is bigger then your subpeona."  Won't have to wave little hands or have ties a mile long, just subpeonas. 
Marty Koval Added Jan 27, 2019 - 7:49pm
Bill H.
As a general rule, I do not really trust politicians, be they Democrat or Republican, liberal or conservative. Generally, they only have their, and their lobbyist's best interests at heart, not yours or mine. Also History is littered with two lessons, you have more to fear from your own government than any foreign threat, and tyranny seeks power, always.
There are some historic constants when considering humans. We are driven by the same factors now that we were at the dawn of civilization. Greed, lust, control, deception and power. There are and always will be sociopaths that don’t have any control over those urges and in fact thrive on them. Very smart, very clever, very slick.
In fact, I think it would be most useful to be more vigilant of those in your own party, who routinely sell you whatever you want to hear at election time, but bow to the party agenda in between. They lie to you and I on a regular basis, why would you trust them? Both parties have presided over a century of economic decline for the working class, why would you ever trust them?
The ONLY way to preserve our freedom and expand it in future generations is to “jealously guard” our liberty by forever being “vigilant and skeptical” of those we elect to represent us.
Spartacus Added Jan 28, 2019 - 3:45am
Good article, Marty. 
Not sure if you have ever listened to or read Heather Mac Donald (PHD, graduate of law) -- her accolades are a mile long.
These talks really nailed the problem as I have not heard a speaker before.
Thomas Napers Added Jan 28, 2019 - 4:42am
Spartacus -
What part of this silly article do you agree with? 
Is it the assertion the MSM is biased and all other news-providers are fair and balanced?
Or is it the part where he advocates that only conservatives get to interpret the Constitution and all other opinions must be silenced?
Marty Koval Added Jan 28, 2019 - 8:17am
Thomas Napers
According to Media Biased Fact Check MSN News is strongly Left-Center biased.
The most logical way to determine the bias of a news aggregator is too look at the sources they use for their news content. To accomplish this, Media Biased Fact Check looked at what sources were being used in the categories US News and World News. Over the course of three days they looked at the top 25 sources in each category for a total of 150 sources calculated. They then compared these sources to their bias ratings and calculated what percentage come from each bias category. Overall, the majority of stories on MSN News come from Left-Center sources (51%) and 31% from Least Biased sources. Further, Right-Center sources only made up 1% of the news and Right biased 5%, while on the other hand 12% of stories come from the Left Biased category. When looking at purely left-leaning vs right-leaning sources, the numbers favor the left.
It should be noted that they are not stating MSN is willfully biased, they are pointing out that the sources used have a preference for the left according to their ratings. This could be due to how the algorithm works and also that there simply are more mainstream news media that leans left.
Overall, they rate MSN News strongly Left-Center biased with the majority of stories coming from Left-Center sources. They also rate them High for factual reporting because the majority of sources used are credible media outlets. (6/2/2017) Updated (D. Van Zandt 11/29/2018)
Spartacus Added Jan 28, 2019 - 10:06am
Is it the assertion the MSM is biased and all other news-providers are fair and balanced?
Or is it the part where he advocates that only conservatives get to interpret the Constitution and all other opinions must be silenced?
What part of your silly comment, Thomas, stopped asserting the author's assertions and began commenting on his actual words?
However, I will claim my own opinion here about your assertions and say this:
Yes, there are some news outlets that are less hostile toward oppositional thinking and less biased than others.  Propaganda is a form of free speech but is an abuse of this freedom.  Most of MSM is just a propaganda machine for a political view and 99% of everyone today understand this (except perhaps you).
Yes, the Republican party is known for having more constitutionalists than the Democrats . . . hence the word Conservatism.  Only a dolt (as yourself) think that the political divide today revolves around the interpretation of the constitution.  
Kristen Foley Added Jan 28, 2019 - 1:16pm
Marty and Spartacus:
Proving that the main stream media is biased does not address Napers’ point. Because the MSM is controlled by humans, we know it’s biased, as it’s human nature to be biased.  The same can be said of the non-MSM outlets, they are also biased. So I believe all he was saying is that all media outlets are biased and it wasn’t right for Marty to single-out the MSM. 
Look, it’s pointless to bitch about media bias, as the media will always tailor its output for their target audience.  Just look at what happened to Tom Brokaw when he suggested Hispanics need to assimilate.  Their audience isn’t interested in hearing that.  The same can be said for conservatives as exemplified by what happened to the Weekly Standard when Bill Kristol was negative towards Trump. 
The best you can do is try to make the masses aware when a media outlet is exercising extreme bias.  For example, do you recall when NBC doctored Zimmerman’s 911 call?  Following that incident, conservatives like you should have been all over the internet informing liberals of how their choice in news is flawed.  Assuming they still didn’t change the channel, NBC isn’t to blame.   
Spartacus Added Jan 28, 2019 - 4:11pm
Look, it’s pointless to bitch about media bias . . . 
The best you can do is try to make the masses aware when a media outlet is exercising extreme bias.
At what point, Kristen, do we stop "bitching" and start educating?  Seems you cannot distinguish the difference either.  When does "extreme" start becoming a valid excuse to call out anything that is not fair?  Does someone need to die?  
I appreciate the nod to the truth in the media bias, especially historically, but you miss important context.  Not sure you miss this context because you were too young, entrenched in your own bias to notice, or perhaps it is for convenience in your arguments and lazy analysis.
The social context at the time of the Zimmerman event was completely different than today.  Most everyone still gave the benefit of doubt to the MSM as to its unbiased reporting.  That has changed completely.  There were not many voices objecting to the bias in the MSM then, as there are today -- hence you did not hear the volumenes "bitching".  Although a few of us were certainly making our voices heard.  My words here on WB predate the latest media revolution and clearly dictate my objection to media bias going back to 2008.  In those early days, you can read the opposition to my words which emphatically denied MSM bias.  It was very lonely at the bottom.
The big revolution at hand, in the last 2-3 years has been the overwhelming realization that MSM is very biased and has been for a couple of decades.  Perhaps now, their bias becomes more obvious as their empires collapse -- who knows.  In part due to the internet which has given the world another flavor of bias providing knowledge of what "an information buffet" actually tastes like.  
Welcome to the great media awakening.  Appreciating that you finally woke up and smelled the coffee.
Marty Koval Added Jan 28, 2019 - 4:19pm
Kristen Foley:
I was using MSN as an example only, even though they are quite bias on their reporting. I realize that all media is bias to a certain degree, just like all people. The point I am trying to make, it is imperative for all people to double check what you hear and see is accurate and correct.
Too many people listen to only one or two sources for their information , resulting in them coming to the wrong conclusion on many topics. The media knows that many people do not verify what they hear or see and they will spin a story or topic in the direction that they believe it should be.
Kristen Foley Added Jan 29, 2019 - 12:27pm
Marty & Spartacus:
Reporting can be biased and accurate at the same time.  For example, on Fox News you’ll see images of illegals climbing fences and slipping through cracks.  On MSNBC, you’ll see images MAGA-hat wearing teens smugly laughing at elderly Native Americans. 
To be sure, we all benefit by watching/reading as much different news outlets as possible.  None of this speaks to the disagreement you were having with Thomas Napers.  In other words, we all agree that all media is biased. 
I think blaming the media is a cop-out.  The problem is with people that don’t turn the channel when extreme bias rears its ugly head.  Following the Zimmerman thing, NBC should have been lambasted. 
Marty Koval Added Jan 29, 2019 - 3:32pm
Kristen Foley
 Media bias is real and has been going on for decades. Here are some of the bias that are seen daily and weekly from the media:
Bias by commission: A pattern of unfounded assumptions and uncorrected errors that tend to support a left-wing or liberal view. The national media regularly report “facts” that don’t stand up to scrutiny.
Bias by omission: A pattern of ignoring facts that tend to disprove liberal or left-wing claims, or that support conservative beliefs. This can be the most damaging bias, especially when the media build a crisis, and then refuse to report facts that oppose their earlier reporting.
Bias by story selection: A pattern of highlighting news stories that coincide with the agenda of the Left while ignoring stories that coincide with the agenda of the Right.
 Bias by placement: A pattern of placing news stories so as to downplay information supportive of conservative views. Does a story appear across the top half of the front page, or is it buried back with the obituaries and the horoscope?
Bias by the selection of “experts”: The use of such phrases as “most experts believe” and “observers say,” or a reporter’s deliberate selection of experts who share his point of view.
Spin: Emphasizing certain aspects of a news story in the hope that other aspects will be ignored.
Bias by the labeling of activists, organizations, and ideas. The media’s power to label people is one of its most subtle, and potent. Responsible conservatives are sometimes stigmatized as “far right,” “ultra-conservative,” or “right-wing extremists,” while radicals, even Marxists, are called “progressives,” “liberals,” or “moderates.”
Bias by policy recommendation. When reporters list possible solutions to society’s problems, the solutions are almost always on the agenda of the Left (“raise taxes,” “cut defense,” “have taxpayers pay for abortions,” “issue more government regulations.”)
This bias persist, because the vast majority of people in the media are liberals. There’s plenty of evidence to suggest that we’re all at least somewhat subject to bias.
Kristen Foley Added Jan 30, 2019 - 8:02am
It’s like I’m talking to a wall.  
I agree that media is biased.  So you can save that list of examples of media bias for the person hat comes along and proclaims media not to be biased.  I have a feeling you’ll be waiting a very long time for that person to happen by.
This brings us to the crux of the matter, including liberals, Napers, you, me, Spartacus, conservatives, we all recognize the fact the media is biased.  The problem is hat liberals believe conservative media is most biased and vice versa. Nobody believes we should bury our head in he sand and live life uninformed.  
In short, we need to inform ourselves with biased news.  So stop blaming he media when the fault lies with the people who don’t turn the channel when that bias hits the extreme.
Doug Plumb Added Jan 30, 2019 - 8:04am
I think the agenda is very well laid out by Yuri Bezmenov . I think its important to talk about truth and "damn the torpedos". I intend on talking about the lies until the end.
Doug Plumb Added Jan 30, 2019 - 8:13am
I think the holocaust is their major achilles heel. Expose that and get enough people to look at it objectively and people will realize what we are up against: Worldwide Talmudic World Government. I cannot understand why any Jew would want this. Do they really believe they will each get 600 slaves? Many do when I talk in person to them. They claim to be more intelligent as a group than other groups. I doubt this.

Recent Articles by Writers Marty Koval follows.